wawatusi
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2014
- Posts
- 35
- Likes
- 100
Random but how do you like the Earmen?
I love it! I had the IFI NANO iDSD black label, pretty much the same unit, this one sounds much better to me.
Random but how do you like the Earmen?
I’m interested in purchasing a Phonitor; can I assume that I can use the pre-out on the Sony to connect to the analog inputs on the phonitor to make use of the Sony’s DAC and route music from my Sony WM1Z to the Phonitor? Any help/advice would be appreciate!
Thanks...and I even have the RCA cables! Lots of them; in fact I think they are secretly breeding in my spare parts binYes, you are correct. In this case as you stated you would use the Sony as your DAC. Phonitor would then be your headphone amp. The only thing you would need would be a set of RCA cables.
I’m interested in purchasing a Phonitor; can I assume that I can use the pre-out on the Sony to connect to the analog inputs on the phonitor to make use of the Sony’s DAC and route music from my Sony WM1Z to the Phonitor? Any help/advice would be appreciate!
Mprism - I think you will be completely satisfied with whatever Phonitor you purchase. Their analog Crossfeed is the best I've heard. Also their Laterality Mode. Subtle, but effective. I've had my Phonitor xe with 768 DAC for about a week now, and I continue to be amazed by the sound. Accurate. Smooth. Dark background. Incredible power. I'm having great fun re-listening to my "reference" recordings, as I'm actually hearing things I've never heard before!
You mention in your post above, that you want a "closer Studio monitors feeling." You'll definitely get that feeling with your Phonitor.
Good luck with your decision!
Hi and welcome to the forumHi Kenammo,
Thanks a lot for your feedback and impression. I would use the DAC conversion of the RME fireface uc (until next upgrade.. )
It is not an easy decision to make..... I understand with good recordings the crossfeed works well and sound quality (frequencies range/details etc) becomes also better compared to an audio interface headphone output such my rme fireface uc (that is not doing a bad job). Especially with an HD800 that usually is combined with an headphone amp.
What I understand is that if the record/mix is not properly done the speaker experience can be subtle when crossfeed is used or sound quality perception could not be so different
I am concerned basically that my expactations are too high for my usage type that is a bit abnormal . Basically the purpose as I cannot use studio monitors is to replace them with this combo and also to give the HD800 a proper partner, though the RME is able to drive it at high volume.
If I play guitar through the kemper (it generates a guitar amp simulation through profiling) --> RME analog out --> Phonitor --> HD 800 or listen a mix made by me that of course is not professionally done , I am afraid the big difference from THE upgrade I am expecting is less than I thought.
Hi Hellreaiser,Hi and welcome to the forum
to your first question: the phonitor 2 will be a significant improvement over the fire face. I had this dac before I upgraded to my rme adi-2 pro (and then added the phonitor 2 this year) and even this step brought some great improvements. it should be way more obvious in your case because I had just low demanding headphones to drive - like the audeze lcd-x. my most demanding ones where the sennheiser hd660s which is still way lower than your hd800.
to your second question: there are not that many devices out there which offer a crossfeed function and to 90% they sound like crap. the best crossfeed offers chords Hugo 2 and phonitor 2 (in my case xe version). the latter is even better than Hugo. my rme adi also has this feature but it is nowhere near the sound capability of these devices. I must also say the crossfeed works nearly on every music you throw at it. even with techno music. there are just some exceptions which maybe won't experience an improvement with this.
and to your last one: you are completely right
if I can help further just ask
Hi Hellreaiser,
Thanks for the welcoming and also for the hints. By the way cool nickname, I like the movie series too.
Actually this is super interesting, I wanted to ask in your opinion if it is worth to pass to a better DAC vs Phonitor 2? (probably both will happen but now thinking what would be first)
Initially thought about prism sound lyra 2.
What made you deciding Phonitor xe vs 2? The reason I am considering 2 is because it has more options for crossfeed/matrix and is the one recommended for mixing/sound production.
I read 2 should be same sound quality of xe/x plus more crossfeed options but on one side I am a bit surprised a new amp sounds the same as an old model. Of course makes sense to do the proper upgrade with best sounding and best crossfeed unit for me among these.
Ps glad the setup I have in mind is correct, sometimes I have doubts how a headphone amp should best feeded.
Thanks. This films are one of my favourites in this genre and I am quiet uncreative with nicknames
The Phonitor is a rare type of amp because it has no own sound signature like others in this price area (from Violectric, Benchmark, etc). It just extents the capability of the fed signal. In the case of the ADI, this means that dynamics and Imaging are improving.
It doesn’t change the neutral sound of it. That is exactly why I wanted this combination for mastering. If you hadn’t an already good interface from RME I would suggest you to buy the ADI. But in this case I would suggest you to go for the Phonitor.
The ADI wouldn’t be that different in terms of the DAC.It’s more the already good Internal headphone amp which again stands no chance against the Phonitor.
The XE is also no upgrade from the 2. it’s just marketed to another consumer group. That’s also why it has a balanced headphone out.
I purchased the XE because I also have many balanced Headphones and I had the chance to get it very cheap.
Prism sound DACs are very good but that’s their main purpose. The amps are like with the ADI just the topping. So the SPL would be also an upgrade with this combination.