The shop was closing down so I couldnt try the n3, I will tomorrow though.
I tried the n1 with my moto x play and neutron and I really liked it. There is a slight V shape but still somehow sounds neutral and natural, good soundstage too .
I like the sealing I get with these earphones and they also feel comfortable and seem like they wont fall easily . The sealing is different to other IEMs, goes deep and seals very good.
Compared to fidelio s2, it has a wider soundstage and the BA driver is much better than the dynamic driver at extending the highs. I think fidelio s2 uses a 13.5mm dynamic driver. Sony N1 sounds thinner but in a clearer rathen than anemic way, it feels part of mids are recessed. I think of s2 as a very airy and neutral and natural sounding IEM. Sony sounds more V shape but still somehow has a bit of flat character ( iknow that sounds a bit weird) if you dont pay attention to the sub and midbass. I would like to test some acoustic guitars and other acoustic instruments with the N1 to get a better idea though. I did feel though the N1 sounded darker for sure compared to the fidelio s2. The N1 is not a dream to drive with the opamp of the moto x play but I could still EQ the subbass to basshead levels ( I have yamaha pro 500 and had xb90ex so I know about basshead phones ). As is the s2, both of them felt about the same hard to drive but the N1 did deliver more bass for sure, so slighter more efficient earphone the N1 is .
Compared to xb90ex, the overall sound is much clearer. The soundstage larger, the mids and highs are not as in your face as in xb90ex. Yes it doesn't have the subbass of xb90ex ( 16mm dynamic driver ) out of the box and I found they are about the same easy to drive ( although I have lost xb90ex one year ago ). BUT the bass can be EQ to xb90ex massive levels and still remain clear. The type of rumble is different ( xb90ex is more of a DOINK DOINK subbass like string still reasonating/slow decay?. The N1 has clearer and more DWOp DWOp subbass. Im greek so I dont know how to use the english language to describe it better. It feels as if the xb90ex bass is late/slow while N1 responses faster. The difference would be something like an old used big kick drum to a fresh new smaller kick drum, if you are a drummer you will understand I think. That said the xb90ex is again bad compared with the upper mids and highs. No EQ can fix a grainy/bad phone, you can just eq down it to make it less aparent. The xb90ex just cant reproduce the mids and highs as natural and airy as the N1.
Also I have to say that without EQ I wasnt a huge fan, they sounded a bit thin/no energy but very natural but with a sony signature if that makes sense. I do feel they are upgrade to fidelio s2 or xb90ex
Cant wait to try the n3 tomorrow
Cheers