nudd
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 2, 2013
- Posts
- 702
- Likes
- 108
I feel the same with the H3.
I agree too, but wouldn't that make the A3 or Z5 even better in those departments?
I feel the same with the H3.
I agree too, but wouldn't that make the A3 or Z5 even better in those departments?
I think the trickiest part about getting the H3 to sound its' best is the damping of the very huge (by IEM standards) 16 mm dynamic driver in it. Most standalone audiophile DAPs just lack the extra power to properly dampen the vibrations of the big driver, hence, resulting in a slightly boomy sound. For me, adding an external amplifier to my X5 significantly improves overall clarity and bass texture of the H3. I find that it performs exceptionally well with most pop / electronic music (probably what it was intended for, I think), but not so well for acoustic music due to the overall warmer timbre / tonality which makes this genre sound unnatural. That being said, whether one would be willing to carry a DAP + external amp combo on the go for the best sonic performance, is another question.
I agree too, but wouldn't that make the A3 or Z5 even better in those departments?
Well I too love the Z5, I prefer it over all my custom IEMS. I also love the A3, it has many similarities with the Z5 but it has some differences which makes it stand out. I like both so much That I want to hear the H3. I love bass there is never too much bass for me as long as the mids and treble are clear and not too over shadowed.
Would you be able to outline the differences between the A3 and the Z5?
Thanks!
To me, Z5 sounds a bit more impressive than A3. Just about everything is grander in comparison, but at the end I picked A3 instead of Z5 though it has nothing to do with the price difference. The first time I demoed both, I noticed something doesn't sound quite right about Z5's imaging. Then I talked to a friend at the spot whom demoed both a couple of time before and we concluded that we both noticed that its bass is slightly out of phase. It is like a 2.1 speaker system where the sub is placed a bit too far. It might be just some milliseconds off, but it is enough to bother me. On the other hand, A3 sounds coherent to me and nothing is out of place.
To me, Z5 sounds a bit more impressive than A3. Just about everything is grander in comparison, but at the end I picked A3 instead of Z5 though it has nothing to do with the price difference. The first time I demoed both, I noticed something doesn't sound quite right about Z5's imaging. Then I talked to a friend at the spot whom demoed both a couple of time before and we concluded that we both noticed that its bass is slightly out of phase. It is like a 2.1 speaker system where the sub is placed a bit too far. It might be just some milliseconds off, but it is enough to bother me. On the other hand, A3 sounds coherent to me and nothing is out of place.
How can an IEM have anything that is a few mS off? The distances are not there in an IEM.
Well, I didn't check for unicorn inside the Z5 I demoed that days, but pretty sure there isn't any in the A3 I demoed, since it sounds just like the one I picked up later. So I guess you have to take my observation as it is