castleofargh
Sound Science Forum Moderator
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2011
- Posts
- 10,493
- Likes
- 6,136
when I tested it seriously recording the loop into audacity etc some months back, it showed a lot more than what the advertising suggested. in fact what I noticed the most tended to be the loud bass changing, which makes no sens from a mp3 encoding viewpoint.
so no it doesn't reconstruct lost data, because nothing can do that. but it does add something that can feel like it does. the key point here is audiblility and the serious purpose of DSEE IMO is for really low bitrate mp3 to sound better than just bad. for max VBR and CBR, IMO it's a huge waste of battery life for a change that I fail to hear as improvement.
people using 128k and below could on the other hand spend a more pleasing time with DSEE ON if they so find it to be an improvement to their ears.
in the end, people looking for fidelity improvement are usually not using mp3, so it can only be seen as another sound effect that you like or dislike. nobody should tell you what to listen to.
so no it doesn't reconstruct lost data, because nothing can do that. but it does add something that can feel like it does. the key point here is audiblility and the serious purpose of DSEE IMO is for really low bitrate mp3 to sound better than just bad. for max VBR and CBR, IMO it's a huge waste of battery life for a change that I fail to hear as improvement.
people using 128k and below could on the other hand spend a more pleasing time with DSEE ON if they so find it to be an improvement to their ears.
in the end, people looking for fidelity improvement are usually not using mp3, so it can only be seen as another sound effect that you like or dislike. nobody should tell you what to listen to.