zelak
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2009
- Posts
- 31
- Likes
- 0
I am often surprised by the hysteria with which some people attack evidence-based assessments of audio equipment. I've thought about it a bit and came to the conclusion that much of the hostility stems from a misunderstanding of the implications of subjectivity.
Take burn-in as an example. It's fairly well-established that the effects of burn-in are minuscule, and that the fantastic changes in sound quality people often report are subjective and properly accounted for by psychoacoustics. The problem is that people often reflexively take 'subjective' to imply 'counterfeit' or 'fictitious'. They read into the term accusatory or pejorative overtones, and they shouldn't. The fact that the change is subjective does not mean that it's not real, or significant, or that a person is lying when they report a markedly different listening experience from a pair headphones they've recently acquired. The change is real. It's just being attributed to the wrong piece of equipment, so to speak.
We should delight in the fact that our brains are capable of gradually adapting themselves to new inputs, particularly since the adaptation is positive in the overwhelming majority of cases, if Head-Fi is at all representative. Your brain is, in away, the finest piece of audiophile equipment you'll ever own.
Here's a lighthearted suggestion for anyone who feels let down by the thought that burn-in is subjective. Think of Subjective™ as the very finest makers of audiophile equipment, and of yourself as the proud owner of their flagship product, the Subjective Mind™. It is incalculably finer and more sophisticated than anything else on the market. It features Subjective's revolutionary and patented Psychoacoustics™ technology, which is actually capable (among other things) of steadily increasing your enjoyment of a new pair of headphones. Not too shabby now, is it?
Take burn-in as an example. It's fairly well-established that the effects of burn-in are minuscule, and that the fantastic changes in sound quality people often report are subjective and properly accounted for by psychoacoustics. The problem is that people often reflexively take 'subjective' to imply 'counterfeit' or 'fictitious'. They read into the term accusatory or pejorative overtones, and they shouldn't. The fact that the change is subjective does not mean that it's not real, or significant, or that a person is lying when they report a markedly different listening experience from a pair headphones they've recently acquired. The change is real. It's just being attributed to the wrong piece of equipment, so to speak.
We should delight in the fact that our brains are capable of gradually adapting themselves to new inputs, particularly since the adaptation is positive in the overwhelming majority of cases, if Head-Fi is at all representative. Your brain is, in away, the finest piece of audiophile equipment you'll ever own.
Here's a lighthearted suggestion for anyone who feels let down by the thought that burn-in is subjective. Think of Subjective™ as the very finest makers of audiophile equipment, and of yourself as the proud owner of their flagship product, the Subjective Mind™. It is incalculably finer and more sophisticated than anything else on the market. It features Subjective's revolutionary and patented Psychoacoustics™ technology, which is actually capable (among other things) of steadily increasing your enjoyment of a new pair of headphones. Not too shabby now, is it?