eternality.pl
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Posts
- 193
- Likes
- 10
I never said that it is a bad thing - have sa6 ordered for my gf, so I'll check them out
Originally Posted by tnmike1 /img/forum/go_quote.gif i was told they didn't require burn-in either, but I'm hearing more soundstage depth the longer I use them. OK, so maybe I'm getting used to them and it's all psychological. SO??? As long as it works, I'm OK with it |
Originally Posted by eternality.pl /img/forum/go_quote.gif I never said that it is a bad thing - have sa6 ordered for my gf, so I'll check them out |
Originally Posted by HighLife /img/forum/go_quote.gif They do sound pretty nice, not the normal overbloated bass and no treble sparkle or detail. |
Originally Posted by epithetless /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm not following -- you seriously hear no treble detail? But you think they sound nice? As I understand it, Shures (like your e4) are noted for having recessed treble. You're getting less with your SA6? |
Originally Posted by HighLife /img/forum/go_quote.gif i think you misunderstood...I was saying its not like the average IEM...the E4 is not the average by any means =) They do sound pretty nice, not the normal overbloated bass and no treble sparkle or detail. |
Originally Posted by klear /img/forum/go_quote.gif I just got my SA6 last Friday. I currently have them on treble +/bass + and although I like them quite a bit, for some reason (compared to my previous E2/UM1s/Auravana) the 17 volume I normally put my Zen Vision M seems insufficient with the SA6. I have tried the default bi-flange, my modded shure bi-flange (further modded to cut the stem) and the shure black foams but they all gave me pretty the same feeling that 17 was no longer sufficient. Any thoughts? |