- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Posts
- 262
- Likes
- 25
I compared it with the LTD red version.
Most of my impression are gonna be based and compared against the SE535 as it was the only pair which I had spent long enough time to be able to make a proper comparison.
Sound stage: In terms of sound stage it definitely improved. Makes live performance more enjoyable.
Highs: Its definitely an improvement from the SE535. However I actually hoped for much better performance considering it now a quad driver.
Mids: As usual the smooth mids that Shure has as always had. Rather similar to the SE535. Something that has kept me a Shure fan till now. Being a vocalist myself, I really love to listen to the vocals a lot.
Bass: Definitely more bass and tighter too however if you are a great fan of the JH16 and love it for its bass, the SE846's bass is not gonna come close IMO.
All in all it a better version of the SE535 and in terms of overall performance its 1.5x of the SE535. Whether or not it justify its price tag depends on you.
Hopefully it may improve after much burn in. Its my first impression and base on my own opinions. Feel free to share too Cheers
Thanks for the impression. This is largely the same as my impressions and most Shure users would find this a worthwhile upgrade. Also agree if you like fast tight impactful bass then it won't be what you find.
Re cable, I find a silver/gold alloy cable worked a lot better. Highly recommend you to at least try some demo of silver or silver/gold cable.
Anyway, congratz on your purchase!
As an owner of OCC balanced silver cables (as well as SE OCC silver cables) I can understand and agree with a cable upgrade making a material difference but adding gold is pure marketing hype and lunacy. Gold is a poor conductor of electricity far worse than silver or even copper. I have listened to the silver/gold cables and found the gold reduced the clarity that the silver alone achieves. It is marketing gimmicks like adding gold that turn more people off from buying custom cables and that is a shame as again I think the pure OCC silver cables make a sonic difference.
Agree with you with regards to gold reducing the clarity of the sound. However coming from an engineering perspective the only reason i know why gold would be use is cos it is less reactive thus having a good coat over it gives it a longer life span. At least that is what i'm thought in University.
table showing conductivity and resistivity.
I agree for connectors and plugs the use of gold is a far better choice than either silver or copper but in the cables themselves it makes no sense.
As an owner of OCC balanced silver cables (as well as SE OCC silver cables) I can understand and agree with a cable upgrade making a material difference but adding gold is pure marketing hype and lunacy. Gold is a poor conductor of electricity far worse than silver or even copper. I have listened to the silver/gold cables and found the gold reduced the clarity that the silver alone achieves. It is marketing gimmicks like adding gold that turn more people off from buying custom cables and that is a shame as again I think the pure OCC silver cables make a sonic difference.
yupp agree that the price is definitely a huge jump
but it is worth the money to you. right?
But what really made me put my money down to say its worth to me was that although it was not the best in any area, it did not suck in any area. Which makes listening to wide variation of genres more pleasing to my ears.
After reading several reviews with similar statements I decided to order a pair. Cos that means that is pretty neutral and doesn't add "color" to the music and that's what I look for. I hope to not be disappointed.
Stay updated on Audio-Technica at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|