CyberGhost
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2003
- Posts
- 261
- Likes
- 17
Hey,
Those of you that own MX 980/985, could you please tell me what their sound is like?
I have a Sennheiser CX 95 wanted to upgrade because I don't like their V-shaped sound, the mids are too recessed, so I was looking at CX 985. Then I read a review on amazon with the reviewer writing that CX 985 have a V-shaped sound, just like CX95.
http://www.amazon.com/review/RK13IN9DCFUOY?_encoding=UTF8&ASIN=B009ES68P0&cdERR=Cred&cdPage=&linkCode=&nodeID=&ref_=cm_cr_pr_cmt&tag=#CustomerDiscussionsNRPB
After reading the review, I reconsidered CX 985. But I'm still wondering about MX 980/985, since they are praised very highly, I am curious about their sound and their signature, are they V-shaped too, like the CX? Or are they better balanced?
A bonus question, are they much better than YUIN PK2?
Those of you that own MX 980/985, could you please tell me what their sound is like?
I have a Sennheiser CX 95 wanted to upgrade because I don't like their V-shaped sound, the mids are too recessed, so I was looking at CX 985. Then I read a review on amazon with the reviewer writing that CX 985 have a V-shaped sound, just like CX95.
http://www.amazon.com/review/RK13IN9DCFUOY?_encoding=UTF8&ASIN=B009ES68P0&cdERR=Cred&cdPage=&linkCode=&nodeID=&ref_=cm_cr_pr_cmt&tag=#CustomerDiscussionsNRPB
After reading the review, I reconsidered CX 985. But I'm still wondering about MX 980/985, since they are praised very highly, I am curious about their sound and their signature, are they V-shaped too, like the CX? Or are they better balanced?
A bonus question, are they much better than YUIN PK2?