Quote:
Originally Posted by Shirukii /img/forum/go_quote.gif
While your point stands for the headphones, the use of plastics for car interiors has little to do with saving weight. Weight on a car is not a bad thing, in fact, car weight trends have been upwards since the start of production for multiple reasons. In fact, some car makers make the bases out of thick plated steel to increase weight and bring the center of gravity of the car down. The only reason you would want to reduce the weight of the interior of your car is so that you can put a heavier engine in and increase the power.
|
Weight is one of the KEY parameters in car design. I work on car acoustics performance and I can guarantee you that 100g is a BIG think for any car maker. That's even more relevant in today's environment where it's all about efficiency for a large portion of the vehicles on the market.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herandu /img/forum/go_quote.gif
It doesn't take an accountant's education to figure out that these cans ain't worth $1400, no matter how much is written to justify it. Anyone with a sense of proportion would acknowledge that we are staring at a nice money making scam. The sad thing is that since it is likely to be able to copy those cans in China for less than $50, if that, fakes are going to hit the street in next to no time.
|
Are you judging these phones from a technical standpoint or material cost analysis? You can't talk about the actual value based on sound quality because there's just not enough feedback on this to tell, so it's got to be either of the above. As said by others in these threads, material cost has little to do with the pricing:
1) IMO, these cans cry out loud the word innovation. You can interpret the marketing as mumbo jumbo BS but I actually am pretty convinced Sennheiser design team got their act together on this. The driver is radically different, the materials are original (foam pads), the frame is apparently effectively transparent, combine that to the attention paid to control of spurious resonances in the driver and the housing and it's not hard to imagine these cans probably do sound just as good as their specs are impressive.
2) I think it's naive to believe that sale price directly relates to cost of manfacturing / marketing / design for such statement products. Of course Sennheiser is in the business to make profit, but it's hard to believe their can recoup all the costs by just the sale of this product. I mean, it's not like they're going to sell this to 10% of the audience listening to headphones in this world... I don't know how many would need to be sold, but I also can't imagine they will send 10,000 pairs of this.
3) So why are they selling them and why for so much? It's been said, the perceived quality is just as much the actual product as its price. Hence Sennheiser being difficult with retailers who'd want to sell at less than MSRP. Basically, Sennheiser wants to make a statement that their cans are going to be fighting for the crown and not embarassed be its high price (on the contrary). To me, it's a very good sign actually! Because they would not market it at that price if it wasn't rivalising with similarly priced headphones.
You could interpret point 3 as implication that the cans are not worth their price. I think we will have to wait and see to really tell. I have the nice feeling thouth that these headphones are of the exceptional kind, and don't have to justify their price any more than by their stunning look and hopefully amazing sound.
arnaud.