Stoney
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2003
- Posts
- 926
- Likes
- 20
Quote:
I abandoned plans to buy HD800 after hearing several on many amps at the San Francisco meet. On all but one, they were sibiliant and very forward in the upper mids / lower treble. Voices were split in two: a too-chesty lower midrange, and a brash top end with a bit of suckout in the middle. On the B22, the sibilance was less but not the glare.
Instead, I bought a new model of the HD650 (mine were quite a bit older and a bit dark on my amp) and I'm quite happy now with the balance and integrity of vocals in particular. I do miss the detail, transparency, and extension of the HD800s... but what they did to vocals was unaccepable to me.
If a cable helps, then yes, I'd give it a try.
Since hardly anyone else finds the HD800 fatiguing in any setup |
I abandoned plans to buy HD800 after hearing several on many amps at the San Francisco meet. On all but one, they were sibiliant and very forward in the upper mids / lower treble. Voices were split in two: a too-chesty lower midrange, and a brash top end with a bit of suckout in the middle. On the B22, the sibilance was less but not the glare.
Instead, I bought a new model of the HD650 (mine were quite a bit older and a bit dark on my amp) and I'm quite happy now with the balance and integrity of vocals in particular. I do miss the detail, transparency, and extension of the HD800s... but what they did to vocals was unaccepable to me.
If a cable helps, then yes, I'd give it a try.