Yes I set it up correctly and it sounds muffled. I even set it up wrong with the mic as default device to hear the difference, and there is indeed a dfiference. If you read this thread I'm not the only one who thought it sounded muffled.
Today's games all have hrtf by default now. EVen cs:go has a stereo hrtf option, i'm really not sure what you are talking about. Maybe in games like witcher 3 and fallout where there is no advanced sound settings. But even they don't sound bad without it, so I wonder if they do too. But fps games would be the main reason for me to buy the gsx and they already have good hrtf options built in.
I have my windows speakers set to stereo, with my onboard and bf1 set to surround is a noticeable difference compared to bf1 set to stereo. And for people buying the gsx solely for an advantage, they are better without it. The footsteps in bf1 are way louder without it. But the more dynamic sound the gsx has might make it more immersive for some.
But were some of you guys paid to review this thing? Sennehiser fan boys? Cause there is nothing mindblowing about it, and in fact most people will see it as a downgrade. I gave it more then a fair chance and refused to believe it was a scam. But for over 200 dollars its almost an insult.
Why don't some of you guys tell us again how you don't see a difference setting bf1 to stereo vs surround with any old headphones and sound card. I bet the phoebus works fine, since my asus onbard does... I think EA put a whole lot into the sound in bf1 , definitely quelled any similar complaints people had bout the sound in bf4.
The positional ques are right on point, the only problem is you can't tell distances well, so maybe that would sound broken to some people but I actually prefer it. Because its actually an advantage!! .