Schiit Happened: The Story of the World's Most Improbable Start-Up
Sep 5, 2014 at 2:18 PM Post #2,566 of 151,050
   
It's ok Jason, you can be honest with us... you're building Skynet in there aren't you?
 
 
 
 
 
 
I mean geez, you guys have already announced the end of the world, and Mike's solved the dac equation, it's only a matter of time before you skip the analog part entirely and start going organic... 

 
Yes, the real problems with Ragnarok all stemmed from it becoming self-aware and questioning the need to serve humans by checking bias 100x a second, while running 7 other algorithms (long-term DC offset, short-term bias/output differential, medium-term protection, switching, volume control, start-up pre-check and overall system management). We have solved this problem by using a small portion of a cow's brain, which, over millennia of human selection and inbreeding, have become complacent to the point of never questioning their duties or surroundings. The instruction for feeding the cow brain are included in the new revision of the owner's manual.
 
Which, I now realize, opens up an entirely new set of audiophile tweaks. What should you feed the cow brain for best sonics? Would a rat brain or cat brain be better? How about a goat?
 
Schiit Audio Stay updated on Schiit Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/Schiit/ http://www.schiit.com/
Sep 5, 2014 at 2:24 PM Post #2,567 of 151,050
Oh man, as if rolling tubes and opamps wasn't bad enough, now I'm gonna have to hire my own Igor to dig up brains...
 
... and Skynet will be the result of an unqualified technician who did not heed the manual and attemps to plug a human brain into the machine.
 
Sep 5, 2014 at 3:14 PM Post #2,568 of 151,050
   
Yes, the real problems with Ragnarok all stemmed from it becoming self-aware and questioning the need to serve humans by checking bias 100x a second, while running 7 other algorithms (long-term DC offset, short-term bias/output differential, medium-term protection, switching, volume control, start-up pre-check and overall system management). We have solved this problem by using a small portion of a cow's brain, which, over millennia of human selection and inbreeding, have become complacent to the point of never questioning their duties or surroundings. The instruction for feeding the cow brain are included in the new revision of the owner's manual.
 
Which, I now realize, opens up an entirely new set of audiophile tweaks. What should you feed the cow brain for best sonics? Would a rat brain or cat brain be better? How about a goat?

 
No need for brain tissue.  Just squeeze in a few unicorn tears and you'll be good to go.
 
Sep 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM Post #2,569 of 151,050
images
  OH Schitt!!!!
 
Sep 5, 2014 at 3:59 PM Post #2,571 of 151,050
 
And, manufacturers were learning as well. Mike was the first to measure jitter, opine that it might have something to do with the sonic deficiencies of early digital audio, and devise ways to minimize it.

 
The real pioneers of digital audio were measuring jitter as early as the 1970's.  W. I. Manson published a paper on this topic in 1974: http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/publications/rdreport_1974_11 - just an indication of the work going on at the time.
 
That's more than 10 years before Theta Digital.  I'm sure Mike's a smart guy, but... credit where credit is due.
 
Regards,
Marc
 
Sep 5, 2014 at 4:40 PM Post #2,573 of 151,050
Ahem, while we're being pedantic, Jason's text you quote (accurately, I assume) claims Mike was the first manufacturer to "measure jitter...". Manson appears to have been a research engineer.

Nice catch and interesting link though :beerchug:

The real pioneers of digital audio were measuring jitter as early as the 1970's.  W. I. Manson published a paper on this topic in 1974: http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/publications/rdreport_1974_11 - just an indication of the work going on at the time.

That's more than 10 years before Theta Digital.  I'm sure Mike's a smart guy, but... credit where credit is due.

Regards,

Marc
 
Sep 5, 2014 at 6:07 PM Post #2,574 of 151,050
All I am and have ever been is a product of everyone I've known and studied. And I'm pretty old, so I have known and studied a lot of materials from a lot of people. I also look in odd places. I work in the engineering field, and have a background of running audio companies, although from that I am retired. (Engineering is more fun). Now engineers are, at the end of the day, little more than very sophisticated tradesmen - especially me. Over the course of my life I have been guilty of two patents, but never figured out how that made it any easier to do anything except sue people. The geniuses of the world invent and derive stuff wearing white lab coats, I imagine. They write papers and go to hard science trade shows, twaddle on in intellectual fiddlesticks to impress each other, and apply, innovate, and build nothing. The far East and the US academic community are full of these sorts of folks.
 
So back to what I've done and not done. Did I invent the vacuum tube, the transistor, the jitter, digital to analog convertor, etc., etc............. Hell, no. I have manged, over the years built some abortive messes. Stubbornly, I kept on - here is a list of some of the things I have tried that worked: Designed and built the first (as far as I know) applications of: a 6DJ8/6922 audio amp design – the first stem to stern no feedback audio amplifier – the first digital to analog converter for home audio - the first to apply low jitter in an audio design – I could go on.
 
The point is that I have made a career of building audio equipment which applies technology and available parts in a combination that makes them perform, and therefore, sound better. I believe that the human ear is sophisticated and is capable of discerning much that we do not yet understand. That said, I do not believe in freezing anything, suspending cables, listening upside down, etc, for better sound, except when to do so can improve some tangible measurement. Nor do I believe that the solution to all audio applications is a 5534 opamp, as do some prominent designers and authors. To do so would suck all of the purpose out of our hobby and leave no room for any our competitors, not to mention ourselves. If you believe that everything sounds the same, just listen to the cheapest stuff you can. Take up stamp collecting and tell your fellow hobbyists all about how much their collections suck.
 
So what I have to say to the chattering audio geniuses in the lab coats goes something like this: Make something happen; create something which is capable of sonically pleasuring human beings, that is if you are capable. Do something and stop listening with you mouth.
 
That's what we used to excel at in Europe and in particular, here – invent and build great applications of technology: The Model-T, steam engines, elevators, refrigerators, and so on. That's why Schiit does it right here, in the good old USA. It feels right!
 
By the way -- working on the Yggy USB section as we speak so next segment on Yggy back story next week!
 
Schiit Audio Stay updated on Schiit Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/Schiit/ http://www.schiit.com/
Sep 5, 2014 at 6:51 PM Post #2,577 of 151,050
  Eat more Chicken!!!

 
Unfortunately, Ragnarok may be smarter than a chicken. I suppose we could look into multi-core chicken processors...
 
Schiit Audio Stay updated on Schiit Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/Schiit/ http://www.schiit.com/
Sep 5, 2014 at 6:51 PM Post #2,578 of 151,050
Really enjoying your stories jason.
 
Sep 5, 2014 at 6:59 PM Post #2,579 of 151,050

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top