howdy... I'm interested in the Bifrost 2 and currently have the BF1. I'm considering the following Dac upgrades from the BF1:
rme adi-2 dac
denafrips ares ii
topping d90
holoaudio spring 2 lvl 2 or spring 1 KTE
bryston bda-2
mhdt orchid
bel canto dac 3.5vb mk2
Essentially in the $700 - $1400 range looking for a DAC that is near "end-game" which I understand is completely subjective. Does the BF2 hold up to some of the more expensive options on this list or should I just bit the bullet and go for quality at the higher price point?
I use USB like .05% of the time but DAP -> Coax like 99.5% of the time so the USB improvements mean near 0 for me.
I prefer a warmer sound signature and am extremely sensitive to sibilance/harsh highs. Looking for something that will scale nicely with higher end gear that I can throw at it in the future (e.g. Nimbus, xi audio formula s).
Is your BF1 multibit or DS?
I haven't heard the modius yet, but I think this is the DS design that Mike commented on last year that 'sounded way better than it should'... As we know, Mike doesn't typically like the sound of DS saying they 'sound like ass' so I'm inclined to believe this is something special in the DS space...
Ive heard it compared favorably to the ADI-2 without all the other features...
Ive been researching several of the same dacs you are looking at and have settled on the BF2 which I plan to order soon... From what I've read it hits way above its price point, especially for SE... In that usage I've heard several people compare it quite favorably to the Yggy.
One of the deciding factors for me has been looking at DAC design and implementation theory. I do think measurements are important, but that there is more going on than what we know how to measure (or at least interpret)... The upshot being that I believe that phase/time domain reproduction is important to our perception and that most DS designs lose some of this in their filter implementation.
Ive seen evidence that some of this is learned and people are more (or less) sensitive to this based on experience.
So personally, I think there is sound science
)) to the aporoach schiit and chord use to design their filters to better reproduce the time domain in addition to the frequency domain (and yes, I know in theory, that DS can do the same IF it doesn't mess with phase) - if you want to get super techy, check out the science on sinc functions and taps
How much difference will this make to me? I haven't heard enough different dac designs personally to tell yet - but given that after tone and timbre, I particularly appreciate staging, imaging and depth from my speaker days (which I know is tied to the time domain) , and the GREAT reviews by well respected listeners, I've decided to go with BF2..
Plus, I love the new modular design for future upgrades.
@Torq review of the BF2, I found particularly helpful... He has WAY more experience than I do! LOL