S:flo2 LO Vs Sansa Fuye LO
Apr 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 5

psgarcha92

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Posts
440
Likes
17
Hey Guys
recently i was reading about the s:flo2, and having a Sansa Fuze V2 Rockboxed, searched for comparison between the two.the fuze is less powerful was my conclusion, but people praised the s:flo2's LO. Now, i have a question, what would be better between the two
Sansa Fuze LO>Amp>RE Zeros
or
s:flo2>Amp>zeros

basically, when output is from LO, Which one sounds better?
The amp in my case, at the moment is a Mini^3.
 
Apr 5, 2011 at 10:01 PM Post #2 of 5
Purely comparing LO, I'll say S:flo2 is better - more transparent and better dynamic.
 
Apr 7, 2011 at 11:53 AM Post #3 of 5
What does more dynamic mean here?
I was under the impression that the fuze had flat FR curves & the LO would be even better.
 
Apr 7, 2011 at 12:04 PM Post #4 of 5
The S;Flo2 has better sound quality through HP jack than Fuze and it improves further if use line-out with AMPs. It has more power(volume), higher resolution and wider soundstage.
 
Apr 7, 2011 at 2:33 PM Post #5 of 5


Quote:
What does more dynamic mean here?
I was under the impression that the fuze had flat FR curves & the LO would be even better.


Dynamic means dynamic range, the ratio between the highest and lowest volume. The bigger the dynamic range, usually the better the resolution.
 
Flat FR doesn't guarantee better sounding. It is just one among many hardware spec.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top