Andii
100+ Head-Fier
Further critical listening has revealed even more insight into the performance of the NTH-100. Some further expansion on yesterday's post.
Listening at a low SPL avoids non linearities in the frequency response(the treble roll off), detail loss, distortion and the degradation of other performance metrics even with very dense tracks. The more the drivers move, the worse their performance gets. On sparse tracks without any low frequencies, you can crank the volume up way farther. That means for podcasting/speech they should be more suitable as opposed to music.
My impressions were very favorable after a long listening session at a very modest near background volume while I was reading. This explains why.
Bring up the volume and the detail retrieval, high frequencies and distortion all take a turn for the worse and worse. And this occurs at a level that is in a range where many people, including myself sometimes, would want to listen in.
My LCD-X, my personal benchmark(unfair comparison alert), if I want more volume, I turn the knob and it just makes MORE SOUND in a completely linear way that leaves the quality of the sound completely unchanged making turning up to even intense volumes eerily pleasant(everything in moderation). That's not expected of these, but it's an example of the most stark contrast to the NTH-100 that I have experienced.
Analog mechanical devices can be quite non linear and exhibit it in complex ways. This headphone is very well engineered and impresses me quite a bit. But they are not perfect/flawed.
Now that I know more about the conditions that they thrive in I will be able to enjoy them more effectively.
I will be spending many hours outdoors with these gently caressing my ears while I read. The level of practicality is off the charts. These have provided me with a lot of listening enjoyment to be away from my desktop rig and loudspeaker setup and without having to shove anything into my ear canal or paying very much.
I like these a lot, I am going to get way more than my money's worth out of them, but a recommendation to others would have to come with a disclaimer regarding the specific caveats they exhibit for music playback that would certainly be unacceptable to some, possibly most and workable for others such as myself.
I'm probably done with my critical listening and evaluation. Back to focusing on the music.
Listening at a low SPL avoids non linearities in the frequency response(the treble roll off), detail loss, distortion and the degradation of other performance metrics even with very dense tracks. The more the drivers move, the worse their performance gets. On sparse tracks without any low frequencies, you can crank the volume up way farther. That means for podcasting/speech they should be more suitable as opposed to music.
My impressions were very favorable after a long listening session at a very modest near background volume while I was reading. This explains why.
Bring up the volume and the detail retrieval, high frequencies and distortion all take a turn for the worse and worse. And this occurs at a level that is in a range where many people, including myself sometimes, would want to listen in.
My LCD-X, my personal benchmark(unfair comparison alert), if I want more volume, I turn the knob and it just makes MORE SOUND in a completely linear way that leaves the quality of the sound completely unchanged making turning up to even intense volumes eerily pleasant(everything in moderation). That's not expected of these, but it's an example of the most stark contrast to the NTH-100 that I have experienced.
Analog mechanical devices can be quite non linear and exhibit it in complex ways. This headphone is very well engineered and impresses me quite a bit. But they are not perfect/flawed.
Now that I know more about the conditions that they thrive in I will be able to enjoy them more effectively.
I will be spending many hours outdoors with these gently caressing my ears while I read. The level of practicality is off the charts. These have provided me with a lot of listening enjoyment to be away from my desktop rig and loudspeaker setup and without having to shove anything into my ear canal or paying very much.
I like these a lot, I am going to get way more than my money's worth out of them, but a recommendation to others would have to come with a disclaimer regarding the specific caveats they exhibit for music playback that would certainly be unacceptable to some, possibly most and workable for others such as myself.
I'm probably done with my critical listening and evaluation. Back to focusing on the music.