RME ADI-2 DAC Thread
Oct 30, 2021 at 2:48 PM Post #4,606 of 5,998
Question: for the first time recently, I hooked up my Blu-ray player to my ADI-2 and enjoyed an album in 24/48 resolution. I found it notably better than my typical lossless 16/44.1 files on my MacBook.

Any suggestions on how to save and play these songs on my MacBook? I know I’ll need an external drive of some sort and some different software to play these types of files. Any suggestions are appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Nov 1, 2021 at 10:29 PM Post #4,613 of 5,998
So for Chord and RME comparison, what are the difference in sound quality in your opinion ? Any comparison to that overprice Chord compare to cheaper dac alternative ?
Just jumping in this thread to say how happy I am with the RME ADI-2 (ESS chip version) I got recently! I have a reference setup in another room, but has an itch to get a one box solution for casual listening & gaming on the PC. I got a bit carried away when I setup the reference system which is below on my signature couple months ago, mainly through buying used gear, but coming back to this "simple" setup of direct from PC to DAC to Meze Empyrean is refreshing.

Comparing to the reference setup in my sig, the RME has a "just the facts" attitude to presenting music, yes soundstage is flatter, vocals are more in your face with a digital glare?, but everything sounds super crispy with high amounts of clarity, which is perfect for casual listening. "Mods" I've done to this setup based around RME include adding an Uptone ISO REGEN with curious USB cable all got used, and using HQP for up sampling and playback. These mods all show incremental improvement in SQ.

I plugged the Meze Empyrean direct into RME and just for entertainment and curiosity, and also for head-fi members like @NickT23 and others :) , did a comparison and plug direct to Dave / M scaler (complete with audiophile servers, power and all kinds of snake oil voodoo ethernet), and now understand when I hear people say it's never a night and day difference in HIFI audio, which I was expecting considering the Dave setup cost maybe about 20x more.

The reference setup is probably more analogue sounding, with improvement in all aspects of audiophile terms such as soundstage, timbre, but it would be hard to quantify with % improvement, but if I try to ignore all aspects to do with $, and just try to put a %, I would say maybe around 25 to 30% improvement?

If I were to get a friend / relative with casual interest in music, I doubt they would be able to tell much difference except to say "separation is better". Some might also just prefer the RME for the straightforward just the facts and a more "2d" presentation of music, which most people are more used to.

Oh and the EQ feature is such a great feature on the RME, definitely need more experimenting, but I like how I can easily bass boost for gaming and adjust for a more neutral setup when listening to music.
 
Nov 1, 2021 at 11:39 PM Post #4,615 of 5,998
Good to know as mine didn't have a B or C. The Amazon ASIN number on the site showed it as a 4490 so I was a little concerned I got very old stock. Had not opened it yet because of this.
One way to tell would be to see what remote is included in the box. The newer ones have the expanded MRC remote control.

https://www.rme-audio.de/mrc.html

Attached is a picture of what my box looks like. I have the AKM 4493 version (serial # ends with a B and has the SD LD filter).
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20211101_233303.jpg
    IMG_20211101_233303.jpg
    2.6 MB · Views: 0
Nov 2, 2021 at 12:15 AM Post #4,616 of 5,998
One way to tell would be to see what remote is included in the box. The newer ones have the expanded MRC remote control.

https://www.rme-audio.de/mrc.html

Attached is a picture of what my box looks like. I have the AKM 4493 version (serial # ends with a B and has the SD LD filter).
Ah ok my box has the same picture with that remote, thanks! Just no B at the end.
 
Nov 7, 2021 at 5:24 PM Post #4,617 of 5,998
Nothing new or earth-shattering in this post, just sharing some more ADI love. I've been using my ADI-2 primarily for headphone use but recently picked up a Klipsch RP-600M home theatre system. It came with 4 bookshelf speakers (a pair of 600M's and 500M's) - since I only wanted one set and the 600M's were a bit large for our built-in's I decided to use the 600's in my office where I keep the ADI. Bought a pristine used Yamaha A-S500 and hooked up the ADI to it, still using my pc as the source, and wow - incredible sound! I've primarily been a headphone user but the speakers add a whole other dimension to the experience. I initially had a CD player hooked up to the A-S500 and when I switched to the ADI the sound was noticeably better.
 
Nov 8, 2021 at 2:08 AM Post #4,618 of 5,998
Question: for the first time recently, I hooked up my Blu-ray player to my ADI-2 and enjoyed an album in 24/48 resolution. I found it notably better than my typical lossless 16/44.1 files on my MacBook.

Any suggestions on how to save and play these songs on my MacBook? I know I’ll need an external drive of some sort and some different software to play these types of files. Any suggestions are appreciated.
Can't help with MacBook file/play input but do like how an optical media player sounds over laptop running digital files. Use Xbox One as my optical drive for CDs, DVD-As, BD-As, and BD media...

Xbox ONE -> RME ADI-2 -> Project Ember II with Sovtek 6H30P-EB tube is my preferred setup using optical media. An absolutely real, live sounding presentation with very richly textured sound and great low end detail. And this is true for any of my other optical players as well (Yamaha S1800 DVD/SACD player & OPPO BDP-93 multi-media player.) Cowboy Bebop OST 1 CD, Blue Man Group "The Complex" DVD-A, and Nirvana "Nirvana" BD-A would be the album standards for my optical media.
 
Nov 14, 2021 at 5:33 PM Post #4,619 of 5,998
Hi,

I bought the RME ADI-2 DAC a few days ago.

I'm very happy with this machine about local files/library, so I'm trying a right configuration for to have a "bit perfect" with MQA/TIDAL using the following combination.

This is my sequence

WINDOWS 10>>AUDIRVANA>>TIDAL INSIDE AUDIRVANA>>RME ADI-2 DAC (VIA USB)

So, this is my audio setting in the Audirvana

https://ibb.co/5kQPpzR

But while playing an MQA file, I find it strange that Audirvana shows 24/96 down to the left in the screen and 32/96 to the right.

https://ibb.co/fMYwXvj


So, my setting is right or I need to change ? Or can I be satisfied that I have done everything right and therefore my ADI-2 dac is receiving a clean signal (not reprocessed)?
I found this link: https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=28996

Regards

Pasquale
 
Last edited:
Nov 15, 2021 at 2:26 AM Post #4,620 of 5,998
Hi,

I bought the RME ADI-2 DAC a few days ago.

I'm very happy with this machine about local files/library, so I'm trying a right configuration for to have a "bit perfect" with MQA/TIDAL using the following combination.

This is my sequence

WINDOWS 10>>AUDIRVANA>>TIDAL INSIDE AUDIRVANA>>RME ADI-2 DAC (VIA USB)

So, this is my audio setting in the Audirvana

https://ibb.co/5kQPpzR

But while playing an MQA file, I find it strange that Audirvana shows 24/96 down to the left in the screen and 32/96 to the right.

https://ibb.co/fMYwXvj


So, my setting is right or I need to change ? Or can I be satisfied that I have done everything right and therefore my ADI-2 dac is receiving a clean signal (not reprocessed)?
I found this link: https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=28996

Regards

Pasquale
Audirvana will show on the right the maximum bit rate the Dac accepts rather the actual. The actual is on the left.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top