Mauricio
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2012
- Posts
- 634
- Likes
- 37
How about keeping your current DAC, selling the CMS 50 and getting the Solo6?
Slackman - you've seen my room... I have permission to knock it all down lol, and design it around my desk set up at one end (w/mini server to Mac to DAC to speakers) and my TV/HT set up the other, so there will be broadband panels (DIY), although I doubt I need a diffuser as I have plenty of 'clutter' in the room.
Btw, if you're listening to speakers. Acoustical treatment is far more important than your DAC.
If one would have to choose between an untreated room and a $1000 DAC, or $900 on DIY rockwool absorption panels and a $100 DAC, the latter option will sound much much better.
My experience and tastes teach me not to buy without listening. Some things I've bought after reading reviews and forums were disappiontments. Others surprised me with good sound and there's almost no information online. I regret for the purchase of LCD-2 but not for my Duevel Planets
This is good advice but in the end result will suffer. While the acoustics in every room are very important to the overall sonics, the room can slowly be updated acoustically as needed and sonically deciphered, whereas the $100 DAC cannot, its performance will be fixed according to its ability and then when you are done acoustically treating the room (and the room may not need $1000 of treatment) the $100 DAC will still sound like a $100 DAC. Garbage in garbage out, this will always be true and it is especially true when it pertains to the source start of the sonic chain. Better to have the high performing DAC and then see/hear what acoustic treatment the room needs.
One thing I often notice - without straying too far off topic - is that many high end setups are sat in these minimalist rooms that are acoustically worse looking than cheaper set ups in a 'lived in' room with plenty of shelves, furniture, carpet and other things - I think the latter would be preferable sonically! Most of us probably have enough stuff in our rooms that we probably don't have to worry TOO much about going mad with acoustic treatment. Taking the time to treat your particular room - that is to find out what, if any major problems it has and how to correct them appropriately - doesn't have to be a costly endeavour and improvements can be made just doing things like re-arranging your furniture. I know for many though, there is the dreaded WAF/SWMBO thing that can make this stuff difficult!
I disagree.
I don't think a $100 DAC sounds like garbage. It can sound quite wonderful, with some errors. But nothing like the huge errors of untreated rooms.
And acoustic treatment / broadband absorbtion panels are something for life. You can take them with you if you move etc. And they will never become outdated or lose value, unlike DACs.
And a $100 DAC can be upgraded later.
I think it's about investing where it matters most sonically, and when listening to speakers room treatment matters more than a DAC.
When the budget allows, get the acoustic treatment and great DAC of course
Well when I finish the listening room I'm currently working on I'd really rather be listening to my W4S DAC-2 in the end than the NuForce uDAC. And with or without room treatment I can definitely hear the difference between the two immediately. There's more to a DAC than error correction. A flat 2 dimensional unfocused sound stage from something like the $125 NuForce uDAC will never have the degree of finesse or the precise 3D soundstage and imaging of the W4S DAC-2 no matter how much acoustic room treatment is put into play.
Also the majority of people will not be able to properly treat their rooms unless they have some experience in doing so, and usually they do not. I know the first edit suite I was involved in building I definitely did not get it right and spent far more than I needed to. You just can't put up a few acoustic panels here and there and you've treated the room, you have to understand what acoustic interactions are going on in the room, where they are happening and why. Often times this will also change to some degree depending on the type of speakers one is employing. Something like the Wilson Watt Tiny Tots require a different approach than a speaker like the Martin Logan CLS II.
I would again say get the best equipment you can buy, set it all up in the room that is going to be the listening room and live and learn how the room reacts without any treatment at all. Then slowly begin to acoustically treat the room in stages.
V800 thread guys!
That said, I don't think there's a good, resource-heavy acoustic treatment thread on Head-Fi, and you'd be the perfect guy to make it. I think people underestimate the improvements it can make, and how easy (and cheap) it is to make decent broadband panels .
Anyway, Violectric. V800. Kinda wish they did it in silver to match my Mac stuff lol. Slackman, how does it compare to the D18 in areas other than the treble, which I know was a bone of contention for you with the D18?