freethegeek
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2002
- Posts
- 40
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
hey.. since this is the Skylab advice corner..
Can you expand on why?.
I've read Ray's description on his site.. and quite a few reviews/impressions on the forum. But i haven't seen a description of why the TH is a better option that the Hornet for IEM's. All the sound quality related reviews seem to put the Hornet slightly ahead of the TH. I see the nice features that the TH has in terms of smaller size and ridiculously long battery life, but those are trivial tradeoffs for me given the corresponding Hornet attributes (the hornet isn't that much larger, and rechargable batteries are sufficicent for me).
I currently have er4s, ue-11 and hd600's with an old total bithead.
Originally Posted by Skylab /img/forum/go_quote.gif If you are using it with IEMs, the TH is the way to go. |
hey.. since this is the Skylab advice corner..
Can you expand on why?.
I've read Ray's description on his site.. and quite a few reviews/impressions on the forum. But i haven't seen a description of why the TH is a better option that the Hornet for IEM's. All the sound quality related reviews seem to put the Hornet slightly ahead of the TH. I see the nice features that the TH has in terms of smaller size and ridiculously long battery life, but those are trivial tradeoffs for me given the corresponding Hornet attributes (the hornet isn't that much larger, and rechargable batteries are sufficicent for me).
I currently have er4s, ue-11 and hd600's with an old total bithead.