Review: Portable amp roundup! 56 portable amps reviewed and compared - FINAL update 12-20-10 added RSA SR-71B
Sep 18, 2008 at 4:49 AM Post #2,071 of 3,234
Just spent last 6 six hours reading from beginning, (not every word, but did went through every page), really admire the monumental efforts, sort of like the top 250 list of imdb (IMDb Top 250) [but this will be : amps that i wish to audtion them all in my lifetime]. Since I have limited budget, I decided to ordered a sr71a (will be my first commercial headphone amp), and will try to use it to power my 8 years old 580 together with my even older D-e905 PCDP line out, that would be my "hi end rig" , haha. I tried to built a cmoy, and it has issues, so i want to see what a good one sounds like, then I can compare...

several questions:

1) will 71a be re audtioned?

2) where is iQube made? (call me whatever, but it does affect my buying decision, I know I should only be concerned with how it sounds...)

3) 2move base look round, does it "rock" back and forth (i.e. not stable ) on table, for example?

4) does cable really improve 580, and why?

5) is there a thread that discuss the phase and amplitude response of different amps. Usually, amps, headphone, etc only quote the amplitude response. But with the spectral phase response, one should be able to attribute the listening experience to the complete response of the amp/headphone?

[for example, an amp can have +/- 1db throughout the audible spectrum but due to the non-ideal phase response, the time domain response can get messed up, and bass may seem less tight...etc]

Have been reading head-fi for years, but have few experience posting here or anywhere for that matter, so if I am not clear or asking the wrong question, please forgive me.
 
Sep 18, 2008 at 12:41 PM Post #2,072 of 3,234
Hi biw. Not sure about 71a since it is a limited edition. We shall see
smily_headphones1.gif


iQube is made in Holland I am pretty sure.
 
Sep 21, 2008 at 5:10 PM Post #2,075 of 3,234
I highly doubt Xin will be sending me an amp to review since he cannot even fill his orders
biggrin.gif
 
Sep 21, 2008 at 5:44 PM Post #2,076 of 3,234
Sorry if this has been brought up already, but is there any chance of a head-to-head between the old and new SR-71?

I've noticed some back and forth around the forum about whether it would be possible to offer the same sound with differently sourced parts. I can't imagine that lead vs some other material in a few components would make a difference...or would it? Lead-free solder certainly behaves differently from the leaded stuff, in my experience, but I don't know if that would apply to sonic performance.

I've been cash-constrained for a while, but based on everything I've read over the last year or so, I had decided that I probably wanted the original SR71 as soon as I could afford it (not yet, sadly). So I was pretty disappointed to learn of the discontinuation of the original. Wondering if I need to go back to the drawing board.
 
Sep 21, 2008 at 5:48 PM Post #2,077 of 3,234
There is no chance of my doing an SR71 head to head, no. I no longer own the original, and the new one is a limited edition with a huge percentage already sold according to Ray, so it doesn't likely make sense for him to loan me one.
 
Sep 21, 2008 at 6:07 PM Post #2,078 of 3,234
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skylab /img/forum/go_quote.gif
There is no chance of my doing an SR71 head to head, no. I no longer own the original, and the new one is a limited edition with a huge percentage already sold according to Ray, so it doesn't likely make sense for him to loan me one.


Thanks. I hope he decides to make it a regular inventory item in the future.
 
Sep 22, 2008 at 12:23 PM Post #2,080 of 3,234
I appreciate the offer, but I don't like borrowing equipment from other head-fiers. Thanks though!
 
Oct 9, 2008 at 8:37 AM Post #2,081 of 3,234
hi skylab,
firstly kudos to you for such an excellent job helping guide us through this minefield in a calm and measured way, very helpful to those of us who had not yet sold our souls to die on the bleeding edge of portable audio.
i know you must be fairly bored of this by now, but could you give me your personal preference for an one time purchase amp to go with 160g ipod, se530 and a varied but non-classical taste in music. home system has no headphones, but does have lots of vinyl and valves and a relaxing but accurate sound is what we're all after isn't it? by your reviews so far i have narrowed choices down to meier 2move or rsa tomahawk, in that no dac is needed, battery life is good and size should be as small as possible, but no real budgetry constraints.
your advice here is doubly valuable as it's virtually impossible to demo any of this equipment.
many thanks.
 
Oct 9, 2008 at 1:07 PM Post #2,082 of 3,234
Since you need no DAC and want small, go with either the Meier XXS or the Tomahawk. The XXS will have the less forward, slightly smoother sound - the Tomahawk the bolder, more forward sound. Choose accordingly
wink.gif
 
Oct 9, 2008 at 3:29 PM Post #2,084 of 3,234
No - the 71A is a mostly sold out limited edition - not much point for me to review it.

I WILL be adding the new ALO portable amp soon, though
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Oct 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM Post #2,085 of 3,234
FWIW I prefer the sound of the original SR71 to the new SR71A The bass is in better balance to the highs. The new one has IMO to much bass for the highs.

As far as the Reference, I have one about 6 weeks old and I prefer the new SR71A to it. BTW, also IMO the iBasso D3 sounds better than the SR71A or the Reference.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top