I got an HTA-1 last week and have been A/B'ing vs the AMB/MrX CKKIII that has very quickly become undislodgeable from my work rig.
(
Love the CKKIII !!)
At first, I didn't like the HTA-1 much. The lows and mids were fine, but I felt the highs were a little mushier than the CKKIII. I felt the CKKIII was more detailed and warmer at the same time.
Flash forward. Whether it's "burn in" (I do believe that tubes benefit from time at working temperature), or my brain getting used to the HTA-1, I quite like it now. It seems to be a very balanced amp, and I would say that it's a hair more forgiving for poorly mastered source material than the CKKIII.
My one small complaint is that I've used it exclusively with RS2i's and HF2's, and the gain is a little high for those headphones. Through a PC swapping back and forth between the HRT MS2 and AMB/MrX's y2 (gamma2) USB DACs, I have hit 8:30 maybe 9 o'clock on the vol with some low volume mastered '80's CDs, but with more modern (loud) CDs, I'm only 1/4" to 3/8" above zero. Even that low, the sound is fine, and I can't detect any channel imbalance, but still, I'd like to be able to use more of the volume dial.
In that initial moment of my unhappiness with it, I ordered a Valhalla. So I plan to compare more when I get that one.
The HTA-1 is a hybrid and the Valhalla is all tube, so I have already convinced myself that I could justify keeping them both ...