Good thing it was "almost spewed my drink." I know I had a good fit with the DBA and tried just about every tip on the market. For me resolution/refinement/detail is defined by the overall presentation of the music as a whole and the individual instruments contained within the presentation. Note articulation including body, tone, and timbre were superior in my comparison as well as shape of the note. That does not necessarily mean the drivers are superior, but the tuning for sure is, in my opinion, superior. While the DBA brings the details more to light with the sound signature, I hear more subtle instrument/performer queues with the SM3. I won't go into detail here about differences in some notes that I heard, but for me the differences were there. Following the SM3 thread and DBA thread to an extent I figure 40 to 50% of the people that get the SM3 don't hear it the way I do for some reason. My guess is the differences are based on some ratio of fit vs. psychoacoustics, swayed more to the psychoacoustics side.
I would be happy to keep discussing this with you but think might be best to use PM or move it to the SM3 or DBA threads if you agree
.