Tuco1965
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2012
- Posts
- 4,545
- Likes
- 192
I listen to both for the music, and nothing else.
well what are you listening to, the quality of silence? or the quality of music?
if you think LPs can never be as quiet as a cd ... for actual human listening. you've not heard a good one yet. proper alignment takes skill almost nobody makes the time for.
a manual car will l drive like **** if you don't know how to shift. CDs are just automatics that teach you nothing.
yep just as I thought. learning is obsolete
the greatest hilarity of this thread is using the word love and rational in the same sentence
perfection is ****** boring.. and also relative. its music you're trying to talk about here right??
vinyl will teach you pretty hardcore about physics. sound is physics.
CDs will only teach you how to spend money to "improve" the sound.
Yeah, it's MUSIC, my friend. Silence is a part of musical enjoyment.
Try listening to Arvo Part's Spegel am Spiegel with mediocre background noise. Or a solo piano piece like a Beethoven sonata's adagio, or even a string quartet..
(I can buy 10 CDs for the price of one new LP)
Plus, unlike the CD, one can hear below the noise floor
Although I agree that the noise is relatively benign, this is somewhat false. CDs with proper dither applied can also play tones "below" the noise floor - you can easily create a 16 bit dithered file with a tone at 1/4 of a LSB or lower (-100dB or lower).
I can only state what I've heard with my own ears. Hypothetical pronouncements mean nothing to my enjoyment of music.
You can hear it easily enough. Try it yourself! Make a 24 bit file in an audio editor that is completely silent except for a -100dBFS tone. Downconvert it to 16 bit with noise-shaped dither. You'll still be able to hear the tone, despite it being quieter than the "96dB" dynamic range usually claimed for CD. You can go even quieter than that too!
Plus, unlike the CD, one can hear below the noise floor.
that's fine- but please refrain from spouting nonsense on the subject:
you're going to get called on technically incorrect statements in the Sound Science subforum
you didn't have to toss that line in to make your point and you doubled down by stating you don't care to even test it subjectively