PinkFloyd
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2009
- Posts
- 9,511
- Likes
- 31
Quote:
I take it "Bullsh*t" is a reference to the "Peter Belt Rainbow Foil" and I assume your appraisal results from your listening tests with Rainbow foil?
Quote:
Why are you contributing to this thread then if you aren't going to bother reading anything as you don't believe in it, are you only here to thread crap?
Quote:
That's very open minded of you but why not dispense with the "probablies and evens" and take a few minutes to read it first and then provide comment based on what you have read?
Quote:
If you were me you'd be of an open mind and would be trying a sample for yourself and wouldn't be shooting of sweeping statements like "You believe this ******** works and he doesn't." "I personally doubt that anyone who doesn't believe this crap works is going to bother reading it" etc. etc.
Quote:
Oh you managed to read that then? You're obviously a selective perceiver who only reads what they want to..... you say you're not interested in reading about the rainbow foil........ again I ask, "why are you looking at this thread?"
Quote:
You said it.
Originally Posted by radrd You've both made your opinions clear ALREADY. You believe this ******** works and he doesn't. |
I take it "Bullsh*t" is a reference to the "Peter Belt Rainbow Foil" and I assume your appraisal results from your listening tests with Rainbow foil?
Quote:
Originally Posted by radrd As far as whether that essay is worth reading, I personally doubt that anyone who doesn't believe this crap works is going to bother reading it (me...). |
Why are you contributing to this thread then if you aren't going to bother reading anything as you don't believe in it, are you only here to thread crap?
Quote:
Originally Posted by radrd However, I'll concede that it's probably interesting and maybe even informative. |
That's very open minded of you but why not dispense with the "probablies and evens" and take a few minutes to read it first and then provide comment based on what you have read?
Quote:
Originally Posted by radrd If I were you I would encourage discussions on that, possibly in a new thread about the psychology of listening or whatever. |
If you were me you'd be of an open mind and would be trying a sample for yourself and wouldn't be shooting of sweeping statements like "You believe this ******** works and he doesn't." "I personally doubt that anyone who doesn't believe this crap works is going to bother reading it" etc. etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by radrd However, the rest of your posting back and forth with Rodbac about whether the foil works is pure idiocy. Let it go already. |
Oh you managed to read that then? You're obviously a selective perceiver who only reads what they want to..... you say you're not interested in reading about the rainbow foil........ again I ask, "why are you looking at this thread?"
Quote:
Originally Posted by radrd Now someone is going to point out that my posting is idiocy, and I'll spot you a quick touche to avoid saying it later. |
You said it.