You can do this or, at least on my copy of Roon, just enable or disable the downloaded Mitch convolution filter itself using the little slider button.Is that the “Bypass all Filters” slider?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Raal Ribbon Headphones - SRH1A
- Thread starter once
- Start date
nfandi
500+ Head-Fier
I prefer the bypass all filters slider. If you only turn off the convolution filter it leaves the Procedural EQ boost active and you get quite a large volume jump. The alternative is to have a preset called Bypass and just engage that when you want all filters off.You can do this or, at least on my copy of Roon, just enable or disable the downloaded Mitch convolution filter itself using the little slider button.
MokhaMark
100+ Head-Fier
No, I'll share what @rlawry just did with meIs that the “Bypass all Filters” slider?
Can someone send that to me, too? TIA!No, I'll share what @rlawry just did with me
It’s not going anywhere it’s just a question of how much use it will get; and if it does stay ‘active’ I will buy the SR-1b filter from Mitch, the one that includes the barrel compensation.
However, I have not found ANY combination with the SR1a where I can listen for long with neither compensation or filters. It is too fatiguing for me, even on the VM1a.
I don't use any filters with the VM1a. I always use the SR1b filter (the one that provides compensation so you can take the barrels out of the chain) when using my SR1a with another amp, though. For me, that SR1b filter (removing barrels) made a bigger SQ improvement over the SR1a filter+barrels than the SR1a filter+barrels made over no filter at all. I know that sounds crazy, but that SR1b filter (and removing the barrels) makes a huge difference to my ears.
I just sent you the Roon procedural filter instructions by PM.Can someone send that to me, too? TIA!
Just wanted to post my findings of changing the short umbilical cable from my Benchmark HPA4 headphone amp to the T1-1b transformer interface. I have been using the stock umbilical cable and then my Star 8 silver cable from the Ti-1b to the SR-1b. I also use Mitch Convolution Filters, the neutral ones with extended low bass that add the open baffle compensation.
I bought a custom Pine Tree Audio double-ended male 4-pin XLR connector with the same geometry as the stock RAAL cable. The PTA cable is a silver-plated copper cable (not sure what type of copper but I am guessing OHFC) with Neutrik 4-pin XLR connectors. I paid $75 for the custom cable.
And wow! There is quite a difference in sound between the two. Everything with the PTA cable is more detailed and alive. I was listening to a China Crisis album on Qobuz/Roon and it was easier to hear how instruments are played and voices sung. Midrange had more immediacy and body while treble was more delicate and detailed. I am not sure about the bass yet but it was still there. The soundstage was larger and more transparent while dynamics were at least as good as stock. There was even a slight warmth added which IMO is somewhat unusual in that the increased detail didn't accompany a leaner and hyperdetailed sound.
I know RAAL has entertained the idea of a higher value umbilical cable but probably hasn't due to being busy with their new headphone rollout. In the meantime, for those of us who love the SR-1b, I highly recommend getting an aftermarket cable for what is really a reasonable price.
I bought a custom Pine Tree Audio double-ended male 4-pin XLR connector with the same geometry as the stock RAAL cable. The PTA cable is a silver-plated copper cable (not sure what type of copper but I am guessing OHFC) with Neutrik 4-pin XLR connectors. I paid $75 for the custom cable.
And wow! There is quite a difference in sound between the two. Everything with the PTA cable is more detailed and alive. I was listening to a China Crisis album on Qobuz/Roon and it was easier to hear how instruments are played and voices sung. Midrange had more immediacy and body while treble was more delicate and detailed. I am not sure about the bass yet but it was still there. The soundstage was larger and more transparent while dynamics were at least as good as stock. There was even a slight warmth added which IMO is somewhat unusual in that the increased detail didn't accompany a leaner and hyperdetailed sound.
I know RAAL has entertained the idea of a higher value umbilical cable but probably hasn't due to being busy with their new headphone rollout. In the meantime, for those of us who love the SR-1b, I highly recommend getting an aftermarket cable for what is really a reasonable price.
yellowblue
100+ Head-Fier
Interesting! @rlawry can you show a pictue of your new cable? Which specs do I need to provide to an aftermarket cable manufacturer (I am thinking for example about Lavricables in Europe) to get the right cable?
I also wondered many times why Raal offers the Star-8 as upgraded headphone cable and not an upgrade for the cable which connects the interface with the headphone amp. I have an Immanis on order and want to use it with the T1-1b. Does the Immanis have a different cable which comes with their new interface?
@Aleksandar R. , do you have plans for a new cable?
I also wondered many times why Raal offers the Star-8 as upgraded headphone cable and not an upgrade for the cable which connects the interface with the headphone amp. I have an Immanis on order and want to use it with the T1-1b. Does the Immanis have a different cable which comes with their new interface?
@Aleksandar R. , do you have plans for a new cable?
Last edited:
Hello @yellowblue:Interesting! @rlawry can you show a pictue of your new cable? Which specs do I need to provide to an aftermarket cable manufacturer (I am thinking for example about Lavricables in Europe) to get the right cable?
I also wondered many times why Raal offers the Star-8 as upgraded headphone cable and not an upgrade for the cable which connects the interface with the headphone amp. I have an Immanis on order and want to use it with the T1-1b. Does the Immanis have a different cable which comes with their new interface?
@Aleksandar R. , have you plans for a new cable?
I attached a photo of the stock RAAL umbilical cable which is on the left, along with my Pine Tree Audio umbilical on the right. It is slightly longer but works the same. I did confirm with PTA that the cable wire is silver-plated OFC copper, so it is not pure silver like the Star 8 cable sold by RAAL. I am guessing RAAL never developed an upgraded umbilical as they indicate its effect less than the cable from the Ti-1a/b to the SR-1b which must be of a very low impedance so as not to change the spectral balance of the phones.
Attachments
MokhaMark
100+ Head-Fier
Hi @rlawryJust wanted to post my findings of changing the short umbilical cable from my Benchmark HPA4 headphone amp to the T1-1b transformer interface. I have been using the stock umbilical cable and then my Star 8 silver cable from the Ti-1b to the SR-1b. I also use Mitch Convolution Filters, the neutral ones with extended low bass that add the open baffle compensation.
I bought a custom Pine Tree Audio double-ended male 4-pin XLR connector with the same geometry as the stock RAAL cable. The PTA cable is a silver-plated copper cable (not sure what type of copper but I am guessing OHFC) with Neutrik 4-pin XLR connectors. I paid $75 for the custom cable.
And wow! There is quite a difference in sound between the two. Everything with the PTA cable is more detailed and alive. I was listening to a China Crisis album on Qobuz/Roon and it was easier to hear how instruments are played and voices sung. Midrange had more immediacy and body while treble was more delicate and detailed. I am not sure about the bass yet but it was still there. The soundstage was larger and more transparent while dynamics were at least as good as stock. There was even a slight warmth added which IMO is somewhat unusual in that the increased detail didn't accompany a leaner and hyperdetailed sound.
I know RAAL has entertained the idea of a higher value umbilical cable but probably hasn't due to being busy with their new headphone rollout. In the meantime, for those of us who love the SR-1b, I highly recommend getting an aftermarket cable for what is really a reasonable price.
FYI, when the Magna and Immanis were sent to me recently, they were sent with a new Star8 cable and a Star8 cable "umbilical" cord as well. It was longer than the stock version that used to come with the Ti1a, and appeared to be made form the same material as the new thicker Star8 for the Magna. It was also longer (I was stupid and didn't measure it, I'd guess 3 feet?). I do not know if there will be a similar one made for the new Immanis Star8 also, there is a different one for each new headphone now. Maybe @Aleksandar R. can clarify. I did not do any listening tests between them so cannot speak to that but wanted to let you know they may in fact already be in production.
Last edited:
So, do we have an official release date on the Immanis?
nfandi
500+ Head-Fier
No.So, do we have an official release date on the Immanis?
A few dealer/customer orders might be supplied in April but we now expect more volume to flow after Munich.
Last edited:
Aleksandar R.
Sponsor: RAAL 1995
About supply timeline, nothing is firmly known yet.
The last remaining parts will be delivered to us while I'm at CanJam SG.
Then those parts need to be polished, plated or anodized and go into assembly, if they are dimensionally correct in the first place.
If they are all OK, we will order more...
Things are moving, but I can't promise the dates, just a rough timeline.
We are currently finishing the Show-demos for CanJam SG and we will need to do the same, but in double quantity for Munich Shows.
And there are scheduled reviews that are long-overdue, so that has to be taken care of between SG and Munich.
So, once the Munich is over, we will breathe much easier and get a chance to work on pieces that so many people are waiting for to be delivered.
As we go, we will send small shipments out, so people that are waiting for longest, will be supplied as soon as possible, and then down the waiting list...
The last remaining parts will be delivered to us while I'm at CanJam SG.
Then those parts need to be polished, plated or anodized and go into assembly, if they are dimensionally correct in the first place.
If they are all OK, we will order more...
Things are moving, but I can't promise the dates, just a rough timeline.
We are currently finishing the Show-demos for CanJam SG and we will need to do the same, but in double quantity for Munich Shows.
And there are scheduled reviews that are long-overdue, so that has to be taken care of between SG and Munich.
So, once the Munich is over, we will breathe much easier and get a chance to work on pieces that so many people are waiting for to be delivered.
As we go, we will send small shipments out, so people that are waiting for longest, will be supplied as soon as possible, and then down the waiting list...
Stay updated on RAAL 1995 at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Aleksandar R.
Sponsor: RAAL 1995
Yes, the cable that goes between amp and Inteface is not critical for specs, so there really was no need to use STAR-8 topology for that position.Hello @yellowblue:
I attached a photo of the stock RAAL umbilical cable which is on the left, along with my Pine Tree Audio umbilical on the right. It is slightly longer but works the same. I did confirm with PTA that the cable wire is silver-plated OFC copper, so it is not pure silver like the Star 8 cable sold by RAAL. I am guessing RAAL never developed an upgraded umbilical as they indicate its effect less than the cable from the Ti-1a/b to the SR-1b which must be of a very low impedance so as not to change the spectral balance of the phones.
During the course of development, I haven't heard meaningful differences between several types of wires and cable topologies at those lengths and terminating impedances (4-32 Ohms), so never offered any upgrades as they would be superficial in my view.
I'm not saying that nobody can hear a difference and that it is insignificant to everyone, of course.
It's just that I don't see it as worth pursuing on my part, as it is an item with broad and generic specs that will all function properly, so it's not one of the primary tasks in pioneering the new headphone tech to the market among all other problems that had to be solved.
Last edited:
Stay updated on RAAL 1995 at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
yellowblue
100+ Head-Fier
Some more findings after you had more time to listen? How is the bass comparing the two cables?And wow! There is quite a difference in sound between the two. Everything with the PTA cable is more detailed and alive. I was listening to a China Crisis album on Qobuz/Roon and it was easier to hear how instruments are played and voices sung. Midrange had more immediacy and body while treble was more delicate and detailed. I am not sure about the bass yet but it was still there. The soundstage was larger and more transparent while dynamics were at least as good as stock. There was even a slight warmth added which IMO is somewhat unusual in that the increased detail didn't accompany a leaner and hyperdetailed sound.
I know RAAL has entertained the idea of a higher value umbilical cable but probably hasn't due to being busy with their new headphone rollout. In the meantime, for those of us who love the SR-1b, I highly recommend getting an aftermarket cable for what is really a reasonable price.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)