khaos974
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2008
- Posts
- 2,085
- Likes
- 120
The problem with DBT or ABX is that it can only be used to demonstrate the existence of a difference.
If under a DBT, a piece of equipment is recognizable, it shows that under those conditions, that piece of equipment introduces an audible difference.
However, the arguments of the people against DBT are true, it's stressing, people have difficulty in identifying even real differences (eg. with different files), and sound memory is bad in humans... The absence shows difference merely shows the public was not able to differentiate equipment under those circumstances.
Reaching what audiophiles call "the relaxed listening environment and time" needed to really appreciate a component requires more money and time than anyone would want to spare. A DBT over several months? no way.
Until then, the only objective data we have is measurements, if people like it and it measures well, there is every chance that it's really good.
If under a DBT, a piece of equipment is recognizable, it shows that under those conditions, that piece of equipment introduces an audible difference.
However, the arguments of the people against DBT are true, it's stressing, people have difficulty in identifying even real differences (eg. with different files), and sound memory is bad in humans... The absence shows difference merely shows the public was not able to differentiate equipment under those circumstances.
Reaching what audiophiles call "the relaxed listening environment and time" needed to really appreciate a component requires more money and time than anyone would want to spare. A DBT over several months? no way.
Until then, the only objective data we have is measurements, if people like it and it measures well, there is every chance that it's really good.