JxK
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Posts
- 1,055
- Likes
- 22
Quote:
Just think of it as a fail safe to make sure that you bought a working product. After all, why would you ever want to spend money on something that does nothing to improve your system? Wouldn't you rather spend money on something that really does make it work better? To me, purchasing improvements that are proven to improve sound quality would only bring you closer to your music.
To be honest, that's something I never understood about people who buy "audiophile" cables but refuse to ABX them to see how much they help. We all want to improve our systems, but have limited funds to do so. So then why in the world would an "audiophile" not perform such a test? Especially when it would enable them to save money with which to better their systems.
Originally Posted by BIG POPPA /img/forum/go_quote.gif We are talking about cables right? Never brought medicine in this discussion? Two totally different things. To me The ABX / DBX or a waste of time because it gets the way of listening to music. It creates a disbelief that you can't improve something without this to make sure. How many people use this method to purchase a piece of audio equipment really? |
Just think of it as a fail safe to make sure that you bought a working product. After all, why would you ever want to spend money on something that does nothing to improve your system? Wouldn't you rather spend money on something that really does make it work better? To me, purchasing improvements that are proven to improve sound quality would only bring you closer to your music.
To be honest, that's something I never understood about people who buy "audiophile" cables but refuse to ABX them to see how much they help. We all want to improve our systems, but have limited funds to do so. So then why in the world would an "audiophile" not perform such a test? Especially when it would enable them to save money with which to better their systems.