[mandrake50]

Well, do keep us updated as you get more information. I am certainly interested, as I think others are as well.

 

[Modified]

If/when I purchase this, my intent would be to use it for its DAC only. This is where its capabilities shine. The headphone amp is almost like an afterthought. Something nice to have, but not the main feature.

In that case you might choose this one
http://www.box-designs.com/main.php?prod=dacboxs2plus&cat=s2-line&lang=en

 

[mandrake50]

I read about that model. Even though the DAC would be the primary reason to acquire the S2, having the headphone amp included would be convenient for certain situations. The cost difference is not huge.

 

[Modified]

I read about that model. Even though the DAC would be the primary reason to acquire the S2, having the headphone amp included would be convenient for certain situations. The cost difference is not huge.

not really big difference. I'm wondering if it has enough juice to feed active speakers....

 

[chauphuong]

Can Pre Box S2 Digital be considered a Pro-ject DAC Box S2 plus headamp? Or in other words, are DAC section in the two the same?

 

[Modified]

Can Pre Box S2 Digital be considered a Pro-ject DAC Box S2 plus headamp? Or in other words, are DAC section in the two the same?

obviously yes.

 

[Left Channel]

Can Pre Box S2 Digital be considered a Pro-ject DAC Box S2 plus headamp? Or in other words, are DAC section in the two the same?

obviously yes.

It does not do MQA.

 

[Modified]

It does not do MQA.

S2+ does.

 

[Left Channel]

S2+ does.

The above-referenced "Pro-Ject DAC Box S2 +" does not: http://www.box-designs.com/main.php?prod=dacboxs2plus&cat=s2-line&lang=en

If I were a product manager at Pro-Ject, I'd want to only test the waters with one MQA license before going through the time and expense of getting another DAC approved.

 

[Modified]

The above-referenced "Pro-Ject DAC Box S2 +" does not: http://www.box-designs.com/main.php?prod=dacboxs2plus&cat=s2-line&lang=en

If I were a product manager at Pro-Ject, I'd want to only test the waters with one MQA license before going through the time and expense of getting another DAC approved.

then there is controversial information around
https://www.akustik-projekt.at/shop/detail/index/sArticle/3678
not the only one.

 

[Left Channel]

then there is controversial information around
https://www.akustik-projekt.at/shop/detail/index/sArticle/3678
not the only one.

I would hope the information on the manufacturer's own website is correct.

Before writing anything here, I also looked at the datasheet: http://www.box-designs.com/inhalt/en/pdf/dacboxs2plus.pdf

No MQA. Both the web page and the datasheet were last updated in June.

 

[Modified]

I would hope the information on the manufacturer's own website is correct.

Before writing anything here, I also looked at the datasheet: http://www.box-designs.com/inhalt/en/pdf/dacboxs2plus.pdf

No MQA. Both the web page and the datasheet were last updated in June.

I guess you are right. still many of the retailers are selling MQA, among others Amazon
https://www.amazon.de/Pro-Ject-DAC-Box-S2-Schwarz/dp/B073WC4GRL

 

[Left Channel]

I guess you are right. still many of the retailers are selling MQA, among others Amazon
https://www.amazon.de/Pro-Ject-DAC-Box-S2-Schwarz/dp/B073WC4GRL

This would not be the worst fake news that has ever been spread, so-to-speak.

I note it's still derzeit nicht verfügbar there, and can only hope at least that one listing will be corrected before ordering becomes possible.

Some of the other retailers will have to issue refunds.

 

[Modified]

This would not be the worst fake news that has ever been spread, so-to-speak.

I note it's still derzeit nicht verfügbar there, and can only hope at least that one listing will be corrected before ordering becomes possible.

Some of the other retailers will have to issue refunds.

I'm wondering how they did get this information. retailers do not fabricate tech specs themselves. they normally just copy-paste providers' pages.

 

[Christer]

I'm wondering how they did get this information. retailers do not fabricate tech specs themselves. they normally just copy-paste providers' pages.

I would definitely be very interested to try either of the two as hi res capable DACs..
As far as MQA is concerned I could not care less!
I would be very happy to pay less to avoid it.
With real hi res masterfiles and capability to play DXD and highrates DSD, who needs yet another mp3 style compression format?
I just don't understand the hype around a lossy compression format.
I would NEVER download the MQA version of any album.
I see it as a way to squeeze money out of unsuspecting listeners and companies through licence fees.
In another forum it has been described as "VAPORWARE."
A hi res masterfile from reputable sources is THE masterfile. The MQA version is a compressed version!