Added thoughts on the CCA CRA in the last page. It's surprisingly good imo, I'd give it a recommendation for $15.
Last edited:
@Precogvision have you demoed the Sony IER-M7? And if so, how do you compare it vs the M9?
Animus, aaf evo, and I all had very similar nightmare experiences with custom in ear monitors from 64 Audio and I’d caution against them— especially, given the wildcard variability in the sound and the complete lack of after-sales support. A used U12t or new U6t will serve you far better. With respect to the U18s, it has its own tuning issues and the problems are further compounded in the A18s. Theres no amount of equalization that will fix a custom monitor that’s screwed up right out of their gate.Thanks so much- thinking next about the A4S’ treble response (having read your review) would you suggest EQ to correct the A4S’ deficiencies in that part of the FR? Or does that create other problems?
Pls can you say more about after sales service - @Precogvision had me sold on A4S and I was about to ask for a loaner U4S. I asked EE for a similar loaner IEM to audition and was given short shrift.Animus, aaf evo, and I all had very similar nightmare experiences with custom in ear monitors from 64 Audio and I’d caution against them— especially, given the wildcard variability in the sound and the complete lack of after-sales support. A used U12t or new U6t will serve you far better. With respect to the U18s, it has its own tuning issues and the problems are further compounded in the A18s. Theres no amount of equalization that will fix a custom monitor that’s screwed up right out of their gate.
64 customs are so good that I’ve been unable to keep literally any other IEM because of comfort/sound/fit/lack of any fatigue while listeningPrecogvision‘s A4s review unit was given to him by 64 Audio. You can search for posts by owners who had issues and it was ultimately resolved by selling their units at a significant loss. Again, I would never purchase or recommend a custom in ear monitor over a universal version unless you accept the wildcard variability in sound and actual street value (see my signature). And the treble woes in his review are consistent with being a custom unit. If you prefer to look towards reviewers for advice, Crinacle recently recommended against custom 64 Audio products and Precogvision said his piece.
If only there was a 64 Audio IEM that sounded as good as my unis...64 customs are so good that I’ve been unable to keep literally any other IEM because of comfort/sound/fit/lack of any fatigue while listening
Agreed. I personally like the added warmth. Paired with my SP2000 and listening to accoustics with male vocals is simply sublime.My only issue I have had with 64 customs was the A18s, the A sounds quite a bit warmer than the U. I also wasn’t too much of a fan of the 18s anyways so for all I know I’m biased. The U/A12t to me sounded virtually identical and I had them both simultaneously to A/B
Certainly there are benefits to custom monitors such as the improved fit and isolation which are not being debated— some of the clap back replies above failed to separate fit from sound and the OP’s question about equalization. In fact, I briefly considered the A12t for those two advantages but opted for the U12t. Ultimately 64 Audio has no process for ensuring the sound is consistent with universal/demo versions nor do they provide measurement graphs defensibly showing the custom monitor preforms to the target that was paid for. To be clear, EQ cannot fix those issues. And I agree, the U/A18s has its own host of problems and is their single worst product. The U12t fit is excellent and by far the best tuning in their in their line— I see little reason to play the custom lottery.I would still buy more 64 audio CIEMs though. My experience with the 18s doesn’t outweigh my experience with the 18t and 12t. 64 audio customs are pretty damn awesome. I think I’ll have my CIEM Annihilator just after the new year, looking forward to seeing how that is also.