- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 15,793
- Likes
- 52,186
Hi! Thanks for your extensive reviews on the P2 MkII and many other DAPs, they've been guiding me a bit on my search for the proper DAP for my 2016 LCD-XC.
I've got a slew of questions to ask you regarding the MkII and/or original P2. I've been auditioning a few players, including the Plenue S, Acoustic Research M2, Calyx M, and the Lotoo Paw Gold for a few weeks each. SInce I know you own a LPG and compared it with many others, I will refer to it a few times throughout my questions...
1. On storage: You write that a 400GB µSD would most likely be read by the MkII, but on the original P2 thread people said that all cards exceeding 256GB are recognized up to the 256GB cap and clipped beyond that. Did you test more than 256GB external content with this or the original P2?
2. Were you under any impression that the added balanced power also improves factors other than loudness - like dynamics, control, tonal presence, anything like that?
3. The AKM4497 is marketed with the charms of "velvet sound", and Cowon did the same for the Plenue S (even though that still had a BurrBrown chip). With the PS, I found musical impulses unnaturally smoothed out, the softness veiled the music. Do you find the P2 overtly smooth on balanced or SE output? I really got to hear how the LPG hits hard in comparison, but there were at least two aspects to it: one its unflinching, visceral rhythmical presence, the other the dashing of notes/impulses themselves. Do impulses on the P2 (or MkII) clearly sound polite, laid-back or retreated next to the LPG?
4. Again referring to the LPG; does the P2 (or MkII) have similar depth or layering in balanced output? And very importantly, do notes sound leaner and much less present than with the LPG?
5. When you mention that sounds go faster and tighter on the MkII, was the original P2 already a bit slanted towards being fast? On the LPG, e.g., I found the roll-off and fastness of the music not very far from being questionable in that I was missing some acoustic decay from instruments I know in life (+ in recordings).
6. Probably the most difficult and subjective question: Do you (or any P2-owner) find this DAP musical? Does it just throw in all the details, or does it connect the dots as well? Is there a fluid & palpable emotional centre to the music? The LPG, in my opinion, did not achieve this, despite being absolutely amazing with sounds by themselves. The foreground-ish presentation and the undeniable drive to it give something akin to musicality on the surface, but when listening deeper, I found the LPG totally unknowing that in music the sum of its parts is more than just a job of adding them up... The Calyx M is quite the opposite in this aspect. The Plenue S at least had a distinctive idea of musicality, though I didn't always agree with it.
7. And the last question, also drawing from the LPG, do voices and instruments sound more digital or more analogue? The Plenue S painted them quite a bit more organic than the LPG, in my opinion. And I think the reason doesn't necessarily boil down to it being "warm"...
Right now I'm swaying between having the Calyx modded and calling it my final choice, or ordering the Plenue 2 MkI / MkII for comparison. I've always liked Cowon's UIs and sound specs, it was just the unrealistic, velvety feeling of the PS signature that sent me off on this auditioning tour.
Don't have 400GB card, but as you know, every manufacturer of devices supporting this card format (either smarpthone or DAP) suggests they can support up to 2TB, whenever these cards become available. So, if there is a limitation, it's gotta be firmware based.
In general, not much of a sound improvement, uniless you are dealing with headphones that need more power, and the improvement is all part of the synergy with more power hungry transducers. But relative to P2, I hear a little blacker background under the same DAC filter setting between two daps.
Not familiar with PS. with P2/P2mk2 there are 6 filters available with ak4497, you can go from digital "sharp" to a smoother "super slow". Not a very drastic change, but a trained ear with a high res IEMs can pick it up. I never found P2 to be smooth, it's neutral and more revealing.
LPG vs P2/P2mk2 have a lot of similaries in technical performance, maybe P2 soundstage is a little wider. But in terms of a frequency response, LPG has a slightly boosted mid-bass and a little more sparkle in treble. Just keep in mind, LPG sound will be as is, while P2/P2mk2 can be fine tuned by switching between filters. For some reason, I found filter changes to be more noticeable in P2mk2 vs P2.
I did talk about P2mk2 being faster and tighter, and P2 is already there as well, but P2mk2 blacker background tightens the sound (faster attack/decay). Again, keep in mind, I'm using Sharp filter, while switching to super slow relaxes the PRaT a bit, making it more musical.
Sorry, I can't related to PS since I never heard it, but remember people were referring to it as more analog, smoother. Heard the same about Calyx M. Majority of the DAPs today have neutral and more digital sound, though WM1Z stands out and so does SP1000 CU.