O2 AMP + ODAC
Dec 27, 2014 at 7:52 AM Post #3,796 of 5,671
I'm a 50 year old male with just slightly less than perfect hearing. On my O2 at unity gain driving my 300 Ohm HD 650's I generally have the volume control somewhere between 12 & 2 o'clock. Sometimes 3 o'clock with the addition of alcohol.
 
Dec 27, 2014 at 8:06 AM Post #3,797 of 5,671
On my HD600 => unity Gain , 10h30  don't touch the volume plot and varying volume in foobar from -18dB to 0 dB . 
I only turn up the knob for some very quiet classical pieces to 3 o'clock (when i want it loud) .
 
 
DT-880 600 ohms => same unity gain , but half curse (12 o'lock and crank up in extreme cases ) .
 
It tend to listen at low/moderate volume most times .
 
(ODAC as source) .
 
 
But as some said , 1X/3.5X some the most versatile setting (even if i choose 1X/2.5x , anyway as said i listen at moderate volume so
redface.gif
) .
 
Dec 27, 2014 at 8:07 AM Post #3,798 of 5,671
I'm a 50 year old male with just slightly less than perfect hearing. On my O2 at unity gain driving my 300 Ohm HD 650's I generally have the volume control somewhere between 12 & 2 o'clock. Sometimes 3 o'clock with the addition of alcohol.


On my LCD-2 Rev. 2, my volume is normally at 1 o'clock, loudest I could bear continuously is at 3 o'clock. Based on my limited research this is ok, with up to 4-5 o'clock as headroom, but I FEEL (not hear) like the amp is having a difficult time...lol

This is unity gain btw. I have custom 1/3.5x gain settings.
 
Dec 27, 2014 at 8:13 AM Post #3,799 of 5,671
On my LCD-2 Rev. 2, my volume is normally at 1 o'clock, loudest I could bear continuously is at 3 o'clock. Based on my limited research this is ok, with up to 4-5 o'clock as headroom, but I FEEL (not hear) like the amp is having a difficult time...lol

This is unity gain btw. I have custom 1/3.5x gain settings.

 
That sounds about right to me. I think the optimum mechanical position on a rotary volume pot has to logically be T.D.C.
 
Dec 27, 2014 at 8:16 AM Post #3,800 of 5,671
That sounds about right to me. I think the optimum mechanical position on a rotary volume pot has to logically be T.D.C.


T.D.C.?
 
Dec 27, 2014 at 9:25 AM Post #3,801 of 5,671
I would go with top dead center ^_^ more an engine thing than an audiophile one.
 
edit: as far as the knob itself is concerned, the best position is maxed out, as this is where less resistance is applied and where channel imbalance has no reason to exist. but as to know how the amp likes it with that architecture, I really wouldn't know.
too low wouldn't be good for channel imbalance, too high might distort and clip. so middle is a safe bet in most situations I guess.
 
Dec 27, 2014 at 12:05 PM Post #3,803 of 5,671
What can I say? I'm old skool.
 
Dec 27, 2014 at 12:12 PM Post #3,804 of 5,671
I would go with top dead center ^_^ more an engine thing than an audiophile one.

edit: as far as the knob itself is concerned, the best position is maxed out, as this is where less resistance is applied and where channel imbalance has no reason to exist. but as to know how the amp likes it with that architecture, I really wouldn't know.
too low wouldn't be good for channel imbalance, too high might distort and clip. so middle is a safe bet in most situations I guess.


Based on my not so comprehensive readings of Nwavguy's blogs, clipping at high volume pot positions would be non-existent at unity/no gain, only happens on true gains. So for unity gain, I think way past TDC won't knock the pistons...:)
 
Dec 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM Post #3,805 of 5,671
Based on my not so comprehensive readings of Nwavguy's blogs, clipping at high volume pot positions would be non-existent at unity/no gain, only happens on true gains. So for unity gain, I think way past TDC won't knock the pistons...
smily_headphones1.gif

 
Clipping will always depend on the voltage level of the source. O2+ODAC with 1x/3.5x gains. Clipping is non existent.
 
Dec 28, 2014 at 5:20 AM Post #3,807 of 5,671
Just got my ODAC+O2 a couple of weeks ago, and been listening extensively with Beyerdynamic T90 and Hifiman HE-400. Great for both. Unfortunately T90 sounds so good with it, now I don't use HE-400 for anything at all. Has also made my Yulong U100 useless. Just can't go back now.
 
By the way, to those who are looking to buy the JR Audio ODAC+O2 from China: The "2035 MK1" that goes for around 100 dollars is the one you want if you want one that's built according to the original design. The more expensive MK2 ($130) and MK3 ($150) have been modified to sound warmer, and that's the only difference aside from the shinier casing. When I asked JR Audio about it they amusingly said that "MK1 has the sound foreigners tend to like". 
 
Dec 28, 2014 at 10:02 AM Post #3,808 of 5,671
ANSI..... the O2 and T90s combination is absolutely great......I have several O2's and a ODA.
 
I sold most of my cans and have mostly the T90s and O2/ODA amps....
 
No real need to spend more etc..its about as good as technology gets at this time.
 
Alex
 
Dec 28, 2014 at 11:35 AM Post #3,809 of 5,671
Just got my ODAC+O2 a couple of weeks ago, and been listening extensively with Beyerdynamic T90 and Hifiman HE-400. Great for both. Unfortunately T90 sounds so good with it, now I don't use HE-400 for anything at all. Has also made my Yulong U100 useless. Just can't go back now.

By the way, to those who are looking to buy the JR Audio ODAC+O2 from China: The "2035 MK1" that goes for around 100 dollars is the one you want if you want one that's built according to the original design. The more expensive MK2 ($130) and MK3 ($150) have been modified to sound warmer, and that's the only difference aside from the shinier casing. When I asked JR Audio about it they amusingly said that "MK1 has the sound foreigners tend to like". 


Foreigners have better cans, they mean?...:D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top