Jamiee
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 10, 2012
- Posts
- 454
- Likes
- 176
The LS50's are generally considered by many (even KEF themselves) to be a passive studio monitor.
They are a very resolving "clear" sounding speaker - which is why people tend to either love or loath them...
I'm curious as to why you'd anti up for the ROK and another pair of quasi-studio monitors -- when you could just move up the speaker line by replacing your AX5's with a stronger pair of powered monitors? (Take the money you'll be spending on the ROK and put it into the speaker budget).
I will admit, I have thought about a dozen times over the last six months about adding a ROK to my own setup - and each time I've had to give my head a shake
If I want better sound (aka. better speakers), then why not just go out and get better speakers!
Sure, there's more variety in the passive speaker market, but that's really about the only significant benefit I can see to the ROK...
(OK, yes there's the headphone amp too.... but 90% of my at home listening is done through my Focal powered monitors anyway, so...).
Not judging... Just adding my own $0.02
They are a very resolving "clear" sounding speaker - which is why people tend to either love or loath them...
I'm curious as to why you'd anti up for the ROK and another pair of quasi-studio monitors -- when you could just move up the speaker line by replacing your AX5's with a stronger pair of powered monitors? (Take the money you'll be spending on the ROK and put it into the speaker budget).
I will admit, I have thought about a dozen times over the last six months about adding a ROK to my own setup - and each time I've had to give my head a shake
Sure, there's more variety in the passive speaker market, but that's really about the only significant benefit I can see to the ROK...
(OK, yes there's the headphone amp too.... but 90% of my at home listening is done through my Focal powered monitors anyway, so...).
Not judging... Just adding my own $0.02