[size=small]Overview of
these two headphones are generally common - First of all , are low-impedance big ears; Secondly, there is the quality of the low-frequency. But the difference between the two headphones is also very obvious, in general, the voice of the D2000 colder, Fidelio X1 appear to be more neutral.
[/size]
[size=small][size=small]Easy to push ,
[/size]
[/size]
[size=small][size=small]X1 need more volume, to get the same sound pressure and D2000. But sufficient for iPad volume output. There is no volume is not loud enough.
[size=small]Tri-band distribution
[size=small], Eason's teeth sound more obvious. X1 will have to be much better. Obviously, D2000 is emphasized in the high-frequency. D2000 IF in an obvious depression, Eason Chan's voice is a little bit flighty and sound like your nose hum. X1 in the low-frequency convergence smoother, fuller midrange, Eason's voice more magnetic. It also makes me have such a feeling, every time you bring the D2000, it seemed to say: Look, my low-frequency multi-rod! You heard did not hear? X1 just honestly low, medium, full offer, so you inadvertently by a low dive scared when suddenly a bigger surprise: the original low frequency of the goods is surging! This dive, D2000 is not. D2000 mixer can be said to choose the easy way out, and X1 tuning more balanced.
[size=small]Resolving power
[size=small]in the prelude and Eason just sing, the audience clapping along to the beat. Applause D2000 is more obvious, especially when Eason singing, where X1 applause basic overshadowed by the song, and the D2000 is still evident. And D2000 emphasized the high frequency. X1 pay more attention to the low-frequency and high frequency makes those details have been weakened. But I personally think that the X1 applause closer to the truth, and does not like the D2000 as hair tip. Correspondingly, when the the Changba of songs, the band began to pick up the instrument when, X1 clearer replay the sound of the microphones and other equipment in the finishing, this is the first time I noticed the sound obvious, while the D2000 is somewhat vague .
[size=small][size=small]Sound field
[size=small][size=small]transverse acoustic field D2000 larger and larger longitudinal acoustic field Fidelio X1. The audience's applause and cheers the D2000 feel very far away from their own, the X1 will have to close. So on the whole D2000 close to an olive, and X1 is closer to a circle. Some of the D2000 sound field empty, always felt a little fault, X1 is always continuous, surrounded.
[size=small][size=small]Why, throughout the text did not mention Tony ,
[size=small][size=small]because the gap between the two is magnified in first Tony. Is the tuning of the D2000 in the replay of this song, making the song completely out of shape. Kind of hair tip Lee, with a the burr sense of high-frequency, impossible to ear. The low frequency cello almost completely ineffective, but in the "ring". X1 is relatively much Chiang Kai-shek. Please altar Friends of understanding, I really difficult facing the music they simply can not ear to conduct a calm and objective analysis. Want to know X1 classical replay ability after GMP450PRO of HD600 contrast, should be able to be discerned.
[/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small]Desktop systems : [size=small][size=small]equipment: PC foobar2K wasapi TE7702 -> NFB-5 decoding amp one machine [/size][/size][size=small][size=small]tracks: Same as above are[/size][/size] summarized [size=small][size=small]in the desktop system, both the sound toward close. [/size][/size][size=small][size=small]However, each have varying degrees of improvement. [/size][/size][size=small][size=small]Let me talk about "Tony". [/size][/size][size=small][size=small]D2000 biggest change is the classical listening to. [/size][/size][size=small][size=small]Specific performance in the high-frequency close to live, glitches disappeared sense, and a slight texture. [/size][/size][size=small][size=small]Compared to the X1 D2000 cello still just in the ring but did not have any resonance and overtones, that is the D2000 the kind of slightly sunken IF became flawed in the performance of classical music, with the X1 simply is not an order of magnitude of For X1 classical replay ability, Judai text the HD600 and GMP450PRO evaluation. [/size][/size][size=small][size=small]Not make things difficult for the D2000.[/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]
[/size]
[size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small]Easy to push sexual
[size=small][size=small]X1 D2000 eat more thrust, which is the volume knob at the same angle X1 volume change is smaller than the D2000. This is quite similar to my previous Q701.
[/size]
[size=small][size=small]Come to talk about "next year,"[/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]Tri-band distribution , [/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]the overall distribution does not change, the X1 Eason still has magnetic, D2000 Eason is still a bit cold. It is worth mentioning that the applause of the D2000 is not so sharp, not overshadowed Eason.[/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]Resolving power , [/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]the performance of each of the two headphones to detail enhancement, mainly because of the knot like fuller. Overall transparency of the sound also improved, cheering, accompaniment, vocal interfere with each other, have a good sense of depth. In particular, in that period of a wave after wave of cheers, individual audience members, one after another cries appear to be more clear. Here special mention, is not the same sense of resolving power and resolve, D2000 mixer obvious sense of resolve, but this is at the expense of the IF, makes the tri-band interface managed to create a rigid case. X1 tuning, and can not bring a sense of resolve, but in fact is not weak resolving power.[/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]Transient and dynamic , [/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]which is not mentioned in the Direct Push, no mention is transient and dynamically determines the sense of speed, rhythm, intensity of feeling and music momentum. These two points, before Direct Push, I do not have very strong feelings, or X1 performance is far from ideal. But put on has been greatly improved. Transient, X1 obviously feel the bass and kick drum with a certain amount of rebound velocity is under go close to live. Enhanced dynamic performance in the Eason back field boiling cheers listened to. Direct Push, shouting completely show off, very harsh, we must turn down the volume, and desktop push, I can hear, and thus can feel the warm emotions of the audience. D2000 relative to the X1 does not have a deep dive, transient improvement and there is no obvious X1. Dynamic improvement and X1 is comparable.[/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]Positioning and sound field[/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]positioning I did not mention the case of Direct Push Direct Push case, basically no positioning. The various sounds only about the direction of, but did not clear. Put on the X1 and D2000 have a certain sense of positioning. First, of course, thanks to the two put on headphones, sound field open. [/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]X1 in the case of Direct Push, cheers and applause of the audience [/size][/size][size=small][size=small]would be more close to the feeling, and a real concert is very different. Put on, round sound field expanded significantly, you can feel in a concert open environment, coupled with a good sense of siege, making the overall sense of the scene significantly enhanced. D2000 horizontal sound field is greater longitudinal certain increase. Empty feeling still has not changed, so relatively speaking it is a little fake. Then for the position, with a more open sound field, a fuller knot like, and more resolving power, positioning naturally been enhanced, so there is the above-mentioned before, cheers of "come and go". I believe seen the concert friends have had this experience: some avid fans will pop out from the noisy cheering a "XX singer, I love you". That is very clear sense of direction, X1 have this feeling.[/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]Audio and video entertainment , [/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]
[/size]
[size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small]D2000 watching movies and playing games and more, mainly the pursuit of a sense of atmosphere. But having read the above comparison, it is not difficult to find X1 sense of atmosphere than the D2000.
[/size]
[size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small]I listen to the obvious differences. [/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]
[/size]
[size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small]================================================== The ===========
[/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]
[/size]
[size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small][size=small]summary ,
[/size]
[size=small][size=small]X1 tuning more neutral than the D2000. [/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small], Pop music, X1 ears will never grasp than the D2000 ears. But closer to the truth than the D2000. [/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]3, classical music, D2000 completely not X1 opponent. [/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]4 X1 Direct Push will have a good sound. [/size][/size]
[size=small][size=small]X1 on the discharge improved significantly, is a potential to be tapped headphones. (In fact, from the standard 6.35mm headphone cable can be seen, the official did not think of it as a straight push headphones to locate)[/size][/size] [/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]
[/size]
