Having not a/b-ed the M2C and pk2, this seems to match my remembrance of the pk2. M2C is crisper, clearer and wider, but pk2 wins on tonality and smooth "naturality"..... as I remember it.. IMO..
Quote:
M2C Vs PK2
After 1 week of daily usage of the M2C-+ and switching back to the PK2s, my first impressions are leaning in favor to the PK2s.
Now to be fair Woo from Blox said that it will take about 100hrs of burn time to start open up, I estimate that I only have about 50hrs burn time in with the M2Cs compared to 300+hrs with my PK2s. DAC - Cowon J3. For music 90% of the time it's either FLAC or 320kbps. As for music it's everything from Armin ( ASOT) to classical, 80s-90s etc, rock, ambient...
I am no expert reviewer but this is just my first impressions. I will add more over time, or if there is interest.
Highs M2C
Mids PK2
Lows PK2/M2C
Base PK2
[size=smaller][size=larger]Detail [/size][/size]M2C
[size=smaller][size=larger]Soundstage[/size][/size] M2C
Loudness PK2
Comfort PK2 fits in my ear, where as the M2C does not.