buffalowings
Went way too far, too many times.
- Joined
- May 14, 2010
- Posts
- 4,542
- Likes
- 42
i admit, they're real lookers but beats are really too bassy for most "audiophiles" tastes
i admit, they're real lookers but beats are really too bassy for most "audiophiles" tastes
They do look amazing, but it's unfortunate that what clockmaker said. Anything with the beats logo on it sounds horrible. I don't get how can a company who produces the turbine series could actually produce a beats series with such a crappy audio quality... I'd really hope they improve the sound quality (by a huge margin) for this though...
Either way, there's too much beats variation in the market, think monster is wasting away their money on useless R&D.
Honestly, when I first started looking for better headphones, I was checking out the beats first. When I tried them out in a shop, I didn't like what I heard. That's what drove me to search online and find Head-fi. Now, I still don't like Beats, but I would like it if Monster produces a headphone that's worth it's price in sound and build. I welcome business competition, and I think the people who pay for beats should really get to hear how good their music can sound, and not believe that more bass = better sound quality
If these sound like a $400 phone. I would get one. That is the issue however. Do they sound like a $400 phone?.. Last time I checked you can get a Denon D5000 for around the same..
Hmmm Lets see a Denon D5000 or a Beats Executive..
I would love to have my HTF600 next to a beats display at best buy just to let unknowing folks hear them to see which sound better to them. That would be a fun experiment.
THIS. I would even pay a little to be able to do this experiment. haha Maybe XB500 too (but without that crappy test equipment that seem to cripple them a lot), these might actually do better than HTF600 cuz of the looks and big bass because many ppl interested in Beats is cuz of the strong bass... that may be like on an important scale 9 out of 10 for some.