- Joined
- Jan 29, 2010
- Posts
- 7,815
- Likes
- 3,074
Lol. But some, like me, don't agree
![cool.gif](http://files.head-fi.org/images/smilies/cool.gif)
Lol. But some, like me, don't agree![]()
This 400s is more or less forgiving with low bitrates tracks compared to Sennheiser HD6xx ???
K7XX is a completely different sounding headphone, I have been listening to both on the Violectric V281. The mids on the 400s have more body in example while the AKG has better bass layering. No surprise the GO1000 isn't the best amp for the HFM. I had it here for a while and I just couldn't get to like it at all and didn't review it. I bet your K7XX sounds better on a better amp as well (no offence). The 400S does scale up quite a bit
I tried the 400s with the magni 2. I found the treble slightly harsh and the presentation a little too energetic for my tastes but YMMV
help?
more detailed compared to HD6xx ?
I have my eyes on a pair of HE-1000. Not in the near future perhaps, but still...![]()
Respect..I am not capable of such calculations.
Then I'll withdraw my comments.
Magni 2 is more than capable for He400s.
So your original comment was totally baseless?
Head-fi in a nutshell everybody.
Anyone noticing the sharp rise or spike at certain area of treble?
I find tracks with moderate frequencies great. And tracks that has transient treble ok too. But when you take certain classical tracks with sustained notes at some frequency its like getting a tiny treble spike into your ear. It is actually for me uncomfortable.
Oh Snap!
I just went off and purchased the he-400s. I got a sizable discount on a like new open box pair. I was considering the original he-400 since it is priced to move these days.
Hope I made the right decision as these are my first orthos. I also own the hd600 and k7xx amongst several others. Will soon find out how they compare.
bwcgrx