I've had my HP50s for several days now and have clocked probably 12 to 15 hours of listening time so far. My last set of headphones before this was the SoundMagic HP150s, which were pretty impressive, especially after adding the Schiit Modi 2 and Magni 2. I recall being "wowed" after plugging in the Modi/Magni and listening on the SoundMagics. Like my jaw fell open and I laughed it was so good.
When i listening to the NAD HP50 for the first time, I didn't have any kind of a "wow" moment. Good for sure. But no special "air" or anything that really "grabbed me". I had a bit of initial disappointment, but I kept listening. What I've figured out is this: That "wow" sound of the SoundMagic HP50s is almost exclusively because of the exaggerated highs. You get all of this "breath" and small reverb tails and other details you don't hear on many systems. It's very impressive. But it's also fatiguing on some recordings.
With the SM HP150, I found that a lot of older music sounded VERY thin and piercing. Not at all enjoyable. For example, Bruce Springsteen's Born to run. The horns and overall presentation on this album are very, very forward on the SM HP150. So much so that familiar songs like Tenth Avenue Freezeout aren't enjoyable. It's blaring and thin, and makes me want to change the song.
Listening to songs from Born To Run on the NAD HP50s is a different story! Yes, the horns are very strong in the mix. But they sound good. The unnatural thinness is gone. It doesn't transform this recording into something it's not. The bass is still shy. The horns are still forward. But *listening* to it is enjoyable. You just enjoy the music with these headphones.
I had similar listening experiences with Van Halen's 5150 and 1984. Both recordings are bass shy and have kind of that "80s sound". On the SoundMagics, I literally didn't listen to these because they were such "bad recordings". But the NADs make them sound like I remember them; well, scratch that. They sound better than I ever remember hearing them before. Not that I've played these albums on any high end systems. But they sound better than ever on my headphone rig, which I'm now thinking of as my own personal high end audio setup.
Female vocals are wonderful on these. In fact, vocals in general are very real sounding and have a special pleasing kind of profile to them. Some artists like Natalie Merchant from Tigerlily just make me smile from the first word sung.
I feel like I'm reiterating a LOT of what's already been said here, but I have to talk about high frequency response and details. I've made a big deal about how these don't exaggerate the highs. I was concerned that this would mean the highs wouldn't come through and I'd lose the "sparkle" of some recordings. The top end of cymbals. The breath as a singer inhales before beginning. Those kinds of details and things that you expect from a high performance system. The HP50 has *great* extension! It's really almost contradictory how I can hear the top end of light cymbals playing (like I hear now from The Rippingtons), but that the sound is not fatiguing.
Ah, I should comment on the bass: Bass is very good on these. Upper bass is amazing. Bass guitar notes are very clear, fast, and defined. Lower bass is good and has extension into the sub bass range. But the sub bass isn't like the SoundMagics. The SM HP150s really shine on sub bass. They probably exaggerate it in some way, but the way it's presented is VERY pleasing to someone who has experience with subwoofer speaker systems. Overall I'll take the sound of the NADs any day; but I think the SMs have the edge in sub bass.
I'm very happy with the sound of these headphones. Their profile is almost exactly what I was looking for and hoping to get.
Next post to talk about some other things.
Brian.