LS13
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Posts
- 36
- Likes
- 13
Warning: I am new to the critical listening headphone hobby, old, so hearing isn't as good as it used to be, therefore everything is likely meaningless. I am trying to figure out what sound I like. However, I wanted to share my initial impressions and if you have any suggestions please follow up.
Equipment: Spotify 320kbps or Apple Lossless -> Sonos -> Original Bitfrost -> Valhalla 2 stock mid-70s Russian tubes -> M1060/Senn HD600/Beyer DT 990
Details: All headphones are new, listened to the Beyers for several days, the HD600 and M1060 received yesterday. M1060s are the first time I have ever heard planars. I had the philips shp9500 but returned them because I preferred the Beyers so much more. Brief comparison between each, by playing different genres of music, the same segment through each headphone. I don't have 3-setups so I had to connect each headphone and level correct to the best of my ability so not true A/B/C test. The HD600 and Beyers are 300ohm and 250 ohm respectively so they level matched close to the same. The m1060 being 50ohm and more efficient had to be dialed back from 12 to 10 o'clock position on the amp.
M1060: Being my first planar and reading other threads pertaining to various planar headphones, I was expecting a truly euphoric listening experience. I think I set my expectations to high because unfortunately based on a couple of hours I am not impressed. I am not saying this is not a very good headphone, but it likely is not good for me. In comparison to the HD600 and DT990 I found the bass to be lacking, the soundstage non-existent and collapsed, the midrange lifeless but the highs fairly smooth and detailed. Comparing to the other headphones, I was the most disappointed in the soundstage and separation of instruments. I was looking for one phrase that summed these up for me and found a quote from EdwardPL in the HD650 thread that says what I am feeling, which is "There's that planar compression that sucks the fun out of them for me."
HD600: Enjoying these to some degree, but I need more time with them to see if this is the sound and presentation I prefer. The mids are definitely more forward, which pushes me to the first row of the soundstage. Bass is very good, clean and fast, mids are prominent and highs are detailed without being uncomfortable. Wider soundstage and better separation of instruments than the M1060 but not as wide and separate as the DT990. I feel like these are very accurate but I still feel something is missing for me.
DT990 Pro: So far, I prefer the Beyers, and are the most fun to listen too. This is the least expensive of the three. They provide more warmth, separation and a wider soundstage. I find them warm, airy, reverberating, natural and clean. Bass is very good, mids are definitely recessed, and the highs are clean. I haven't experienced much harshness from the peaky highs that so many have with this set. My guess is the recessed mids with prominent low and high end are what gives this set that depth, width and separation when paired with my dac/amp combo. I find acoustic music very enjoyable to listen to because the instruments have so much life as if you were there.
Conclusion: I need to listen for an extended period to each set, but I am thinking I prefer the Beyer sound and still searching for that euphoric bliss. This test has me wishing to try the Beyer T90, DT1990 and Amiron Home as well as the Senn HD650, all fairly significant bumps in price.
Equipment: Spotify 320kbps or Apple Lossless -> Sonos -> Original Bitfrost -> Valhalla 2 stock mid-70s Russian tubes -> M1060/Senn HD600/Beyer DT 990
Details: All headphones are new, listened to the Beyers for several days, the HD600 and M1060 received yesterday. M1060s are the first time I have ever heard planars. I had the philips shp9500 but returned them because I preferred the Beyers so much more. Brief comparison between each, by playing different genres of music, the same segment through each headphone. I don't have 3-setups so I had to connect each headphone and level correct to the best of my ability so not true A/B/C test. The HD600 and Beyers are 300ohm and 250 ohm respectively so they level matched close to the same. The m1060 being 50ohm and more efficient had to be dialed back from 12 to 10 o'clock position on the amp.
M1060: Being my first planar and reading other threads pertaining to various planar headphones, I was expecting a truly euphoric listening experience. I think I set my expectations to high because unfortunately based on a couple of hours I am not impressed. I am not saying this is not a very good headphone, but it likely is not good for me. In comparison to the HD600 and DT990 I found the bass to be lacking, the soundstage non-existent and collapsed, the midrange lifeless but the highs fairly smooth and detailed. Comparing to the other headphones, I was the most disappointed in the soundstage and separation of instruments. I was looking for one phrase that summed these up for me and found a quote from EdwardPL in the HD650 thread that says what I am feeling, which is "There's that planar compression that sucks the fun out of them for me."
HD600: Enjoying these to some degree, but I need more time with them to see if this is the sound and presentation I prefer. The mids are definitely more forward, which pushes me to the first row of the soundstage. Bass is very good, clean and fast, mids are prominent and highs are detailed without being uncomfortable. Wider soundstage and better separation of instruments than the M1060 but not as wide and separate as the DT990. I feel like these are very accurate but I still feel something is missing for me.
DT990 Pro: So far, I prefer the Beyers, and are the most fun to listen too. This is the least expensive of the three. They provide more warmth, separation and a wider soundstage. I find them warm, airy, reverberating, natural and clean. Bass is very good, mids are definitely recessed, and the highs are clean. I haven't experienced much harshness from the peaky highs that so many have with this set. My guess is the recessed mids with prominent low and high end are what gives this set that depth, width and separation when paired with my dac/amp combo. I find acoustic music very enjoyable to listen to because the instruments have so much life as if you were there.
Conclusion: I need to listen for an extended period to each set, but I am thinking I prefer the Beyer sound and still searching for that euphoric bliss. This test has me wishing to try the Beyer T90, DT1990 and Amiron Home as well as the Senn HD650, all fairly significant bumps in price.