niamex
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2010
- Posts
- 102
- Likes
- 12
The caps value depends very much on the rig - in my case Chris Venhaus recommended 3,3 uF for deeper bass and was right - you can try with some cheaper brand for a test.
you're absolutely right I don't know why I wrote 0.47 uf I meant 2.2uf of course
Kimchee I hesitate to buy a vcap cutf for c12 too but Ioserica thinks it's not necessary. Currently i have a Clarity MR cap on c12 which is quite big and it works fine : 35x25mm. If I'm not wrong 0.1uf vcap cutf are 30x11mm so it should fit without problem but the others will confirm it's not dangerous for other components. It's like this for 4 months on my dac and it's ok but of course the clarity cap is above all the others : it doesn't look made for being here.
Take care about your impressions on vcap cutf if you changed shinkoh tantalum as well, i remmeber that they have a big impact on sound and immediately (no burn in) so the change you hear on sound is also due to them, not only vcap (if i'm not wrong it had to do with better textures, silk sound, fluent).
Regarding Auricap on Audiocap they say they sould receive new ones in 2-3 weeks. I tested Silver mica caps but the ones I got were disapointing : i didn't hear a lot of improvements with them at the opposite of clarity mr caps (very opened) or jupiter (very good too).
you're absolutely right I don't know why I wrote 0.47 uf I meant 2.2uf of course
Take care about your impressions on vcap cutf if you changed shinkoh tantalum as well, i remmeber that they have a big impact on sound and immediately (no burn in) so the change you hear on sound is also due to them, not only vcap (if i'm not wrong it had to do with better textures, silk sound, fluent).
I had green ones and sold them, did not like them much. Korean K are better,
These from Technics are better than Korean. This is my opinion only... you may feel different.
OK, so I replaced V-Cap OIMP output caps for 0.47 uF CuTF last night... HOLY SMOKES you guys weren't kidding. These caps just raise this DAC to an entirely new level! I took the caps out of an amp I had just put them in but decided not to keep and they only have about 100 hours on them so I'm sure things will continue to get substantially better up to 300-500 hours.
I also installed the Shinkoh Tantalum resistors at the same time so I'm sure that was a contributing factor. Aside from that I installed the Vishay 200V diodes and 1000uF Elna Silmic II a few days ago. Anyway I am going all-in with this DAC now and am going to buy another one. It already has better tone and texture than the Berkeley Alpha DAC Series 2 and is getting there in terms of transparency and image precision.
Thanks to all the contributors to this thread. I am in love with this DAC all over again.
0.47 is correct in place of the 2.2/2.0uF output caps and it works great. CuTF only goes up to 1.0uF and I think would be too large to fit.
Originally Posted by kimchee411 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I am not seeing where those Oscons go from the photo on page 126/137... are you guys adding these directly at arbitrary places in the trace (no holes)? I have the 4.7uF/16V versions and they will just *barely* fit if lying sideways under the board.
Also, I tried removing C5 and while it did liven things up a bit, images lost an appreciable amount of depth and weight so I put it back. I am using this in a speaker set up so it is more important to me than through cans. It does tell me that the 0.1uF polys make a noticeable difference so I may consider the Auricap XO after everything else is done and settled in.
Anybody experiment with internal damping? Especially those that have inserted large components that "float" off the board?
Parts coming: five 47uF/25V + four 100uF/50V + three 470uF/16V Silmic IIs, Elna Tonerex 3300uF/35V, WBT 0210-Ag Ms RCA connectors, Vampire BNC connector, and Japanese PCM56P-K chips from vintage Technics (thanks, Robert! Currently using new stock Malaysian K grade).
So I've combed through this thread several times and still can't solve an essential problem—the Havana, in my speaker system, still has a bit of edge and hardness in the low treble. Here's what I've tried to ameliorate the problem—NOS tubes (WE JW 2c51, Tung Sol, GE, Russian 63NP-DR), Halide Bridge, Stello U2 (bought but haven't tried yet—arriving soon), Synergistic Research Basik and JPS digital power cords, fancy USB cables (Wireword, Larry Moore, Voodoo), fancy Toslink cable (Lifatec glass). USB-SPDIF conversion does sound better than direct USB or Toslink, but also brighter. Can anyone suggest a way to tame the Havana a little more? It's the best DAC I've heard, and I can hear it's promise, I just need to get the tonal balance right. Many thanks in advance. Alex.
So I've combed through this thread several times and still can't solve an essential problem—the Havana, in my speaker system, still has a bit of edge and hardness in the low treble. Here's what I've tried to ameliorate the problem—NOS tubes (WE JW 2c51, Tung Sol, GE, Russian 63NP-DR),