Hello guys,
I compared Havana with DAC7 (Audio Research). It is capable of higher resolution that better highlights micro-details, it shows music with better extension, articulation of instruments, superior speed and timing (better imaging also).
I noticed that there is a wealth of information on the low, medium and low-treble frequencies, where Havana is slightly poor in comparison. On the classical music instruments sound more natural with DAC7, I think they are a little closer to how it sound in the reality.
The sound texture, tonality, well.. have been played roughly similar on both converters, I can say I like both. Yet, DAC7 it sounds more coherent, more homogeneous and a slightly more natural compared with Havana, instruments and the human voices seems more believable and played with more authority.
The differences aren't big, but noticeable between the two converters.
(PS: whether Havana hadn't been upgraded in extreme way, it wouldn't have no chance,.. this is clear as daylight
)
.even though I said before that Audio Research DAC7 has a more natural tonality and that plays information in a more comprehensive manner compared with Havana (in my system), I still love Havana. I could be happy with any of these, since both converters are capable of refinement and musicality.
At upper-high frequencies I liked maybe more Havana, even if treble were not as detailed compared with DAC7 (I hope I'm not wrong..) , it were all present, reliable and showed clear and with delicacy.