"Mad Dog" by MrSpeakers, modified Fostex T50RP review
Mar 30, 2013 at 3:32 PM Post #4,653 of 6,388
Congrats Dan! Success well deserved.
 
Mar 30, 2013 at 4:20 PM Post #4,655 of 6,388
Quote:
Quick impression is that they're great, but then again I'm a newbie so pretty much anything will sound good to me.  Immediately recognized a huge difference between these and my Denon D2000s which I'm glad about, as I was looking for a more monitor-ish type of headphone to complement those.  Only other "real" headphones I have owned are AD700s, which these completely smoke, not surprisingly.  Using a Fiio E11 to power them with an X-Fi Titanium, which is working well enough, though I do plan to get a desktop amp at some point.
 
I'm mostly excited because I'm really experiencing the "whoa I didn't know that sound is in this song" thing I've seen others talk about.  I still like the D2Ks but obviously their forte is sub-bass and not accuracy so much.

 
I'm thinking about buying both the Mad Dogs + alpha pads and also the D2k / D5k with Lawton angle pads.
 
As they are both 'closed' phones, in your opinion which would you say has the larger soundstage?.. the D2k or MD. 
 
Mar 30, 2013 at 4:45 PM Post #4,656 of 6,388
Quote:
 
I'm thinking about buying both the Mad Dogs + alpha pads and also the D2k / D5k with Lawton angle pads.
 
As they are both 'closed' phones, in your opinion which would you say has the larger soundstage?.. the D2k or MD. 

I have the D5000 with angled pads and the MD with alpha pads.  I'm not certain that soundstage is anything more than a subjective characteristic.  The Denons do not isolate nearly as well and they leak quite a bit of sound. Because of this, it might seem that the D5K have a broader soundstage. The Denons are more "open", for sealed phones, and normally open headphones appear to have a wider soundstage.  Based off what reviewers have claimed, I would not be able to comment on the D2K, as there is usually a bigger jump in quality between the D2K and D5K as there is between the D5K and D7K, despite both lower-priced models sharing identical drivers.
 
Mar 30, 2013 at 5:04 PM Post #4,657 of 6,388
Quote:
In case you guys aren't following mrspeakers on twitter:
 
 
"We have sold more Mad Dog headphones year to date than all of last year."

 
I guess that's what getting referenced at CNET does for business.
biggrin.gif
(Yes, that's where I first heard of them, and yes, I recently bought a pair.)
 
Mar 30, 2013 at 5:22 PM Post #4,658 of 6,388
Quote:
BTW, it was hard finding a vinyl to match the headphone, but I did like the look.  What would you think of black text, raised liked the current white text, on it?

 
I'd love this.  Any way to convert from the normal white stickers to this look?
 
Mar 30, 2013 at 5:55 PM Post #4,659 of 6,388
Just bought a pair this morning with alpha pads....got an email only a few hours later that they shipped. Pretty awesome service.
 
Mar 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM Post #4,660 of 6,388
So recently I ordered a pair of MDs, and I'm wondering how well my current amp will drive them. It's a Little dot MK III with Mullard M8161 driver tubes and the stock power tubes (Considering making an adapter and using "Tung-sol 5687 D getter black plates")
 
Specs:
 

  1. SEPP (Single-Ended Push Pull) OTL in Class-A
  2. Frequency response: 12 hz~100 Khz (-1dB)
  3. THD+N: 0.15% (80 mW @300 ohm)
  4. Power Output:
  5. 350 mW @ 300/600 ohm
  6. 300 mW @ 120 oh
  7. 100 mW @ 32 ohm
  8. Variable Gain: 3,4,5, or 10x
  9. Recommended Load Impedance: 32 ohm~600 ohm
  10. Input Impedance: 50K ohms
  11. Pre-Amplifier Output Impedance: 600 ohms
  12. Pre-Amplifier Gain: 3-10x (also controlled via gain switches)
  13. Pre-Amplifier Voltage: 10V RMS
  14. Power Consumption: 30W (228V * 0.130A)
  15. Pre-Amplification circuit includes both driver and power tubes

Thanks in advance for any help
 
Mar 30, 2013 at 7:57 PM Post #4,662 of 6,388
Mar 30, 2013 at 8:00 PM Post #4,663 of 6,388

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top