The Balanced Version at the NY show, blew my socks off. Orders pending.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
"Mad Dog" by MrSpeakers, modified Fostex T50RP review
- Thread starter dorino
- Start date
zzffnn
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
- Posts
- 1,619
- Likes
- 66
Interestingly, judging from Innerfidelity's measurements, Mad Dogs are more sensitive than LFFs. Different mass loading/damping, I guess?
Sorry if this has been asked before, what is MD's sensitivity in db/mw? And what is the weight? Thanks in advanace.
Sorry if this has been asked before, what is MD's sensitivity in db/mw? And what is the weight? Thanks in advanace.
haquocdung
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Posts
- 263
- Likes
- 14
I am in a dilema here, I sold out my HE-400 and I am thinking of buying another Mad Dog for home use or buy a LCD2.2 for home usage. Isolation, amping requirement is advantage of mad dog, but seems like LCD2.2 is a big plus. I already love the sound of Mad Dog with Alpha pad so I dont know it upgrading will make me love orthos sound even more.
nam3less
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2012
- Posts
- 105
- Likes
- 12
The sound quality between the LCD2 and Mad Dog is no contest. The LCD2 is better in every way. It's up to you to figure out if that difference is worth $700. Judging purely from a price/performance ratio, it's not a 3x the sound quality jump. But the LCD2 is noticeably better.
sonitus mirus
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2009
- Posts
- 1,861
- Likes
- 664
Quote:
Not in every way. In isolation, the Mad Dog is superior. That may be enough for some people. If my environment is not quiet enough to allow for me to listen at a comfortable volume level where these differences could be heard, it doesn't matter too much.
The LCD-2 may sound spectacular, but not if all my music comes with a faint sound of my refrigerator's compressor droning along with it.
The sound quality between the LCD2 and Mad Dog is no contest. The LCD2 is better in every way. It's up to you to figure out if that difference is worth $700. Judging purely from a price/performance ratio, it's not a 3x the sound quality jump. But the LCD2 is noticeably better.
Not in every way. In isolation, the Mad Dog is superior. That may be enough for some people. If my environment is not quiet enough to allow for me to listen at a comfortable volume level where these differences could be heard, it doesn't matter too much.
The LCD-2 may sound spectacular, but not if all my music comes with a faint sound of my refrigerator's compressor droning along with it.
Not in every way. In isolation, the Mad Dog is superior. That may be enough for some people. If my environment is not quiet enough to allow for me to listen at a comfortable volume level where these differences could be heard, it doesn't matter too much.
The LCD-2 may sound spectacular, but not if all my music comes with a faint sound of my refrigerator's compressor droning along with it.
Virtually any closed back headphone would seal better than the open back lcd2.
Deviver
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2011
- Posts
- 68
- Likes
- 13
the only problem i have with these cans.. is that everyone wants to keep theirs.. havent seen a fs in like 2 weeks T_T
nam3less
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2012
- Posts
- 105
- Likes
- 12
Quote:
He had other open back headphones in his sig (HD650) so I wasn't concerned with that. But yes, if isolation is a must at home, then MD for sure.
Not in every way. In isolation, the Mad Dog is superior. That may be enough for some people. If my environment is not quiet enough to allow for me to listen at a comfortable volume level where these differences could be heard, it doesn't matter too much.
The LCD-2 may sound spectacular, but not if all my music comes with a faint sound of my refrigerator's compressor droning along with it.
He had other open back headphones in his sig (HD650) so I wasn't concerned with that. But yes, if isolation is a must at home, then MD for sure.
paradoxper
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
I got you.
the only problem i have with these cans.. is that everyone wants to keep theirs.. havent seen a fs in like 2 weeks T_T
I got you.
mikek200
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
PMSENT
the only problem i have with these cans.. is that everyone wants to keep theirs.. havent seen a fs in like 2 weeks T_T
PMSENT
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2010
- Posts
- 19,137
- Likes
- 5,320
Pretty sure people will start unloading theirs due to wanting the Balanced version.
MattTCG
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2012
- Posts
- 15,685
- Likes
- 3,874
I always thought that the balance group was pretty small in comparison to the SE crowd.
Also, I will have a balanced upgrade for current owners. It won't be available for pre-order or discount, but it should be pretty cost-effective.
Final price is TBD until I know my exact cable costs.
Final price is TBD until I know my exact cable costs.
Make every day a fun day filled with music and friendship!
Stay updated on Dan Clark Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Hutnicks
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2012
- Posts
- 6,625
- Likes
- 595
Quote:
My thoughts exactly.
However curiosity is piqued now to see what a balanced set sound like. Is there that much difference?
I always thought that the balance group was pretty small in comparison to the SE crowd.
My thoughts exactly.
However curiosity is piqued now to see what a balanced set sound like. Is there that much difference?
vaed
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2012
- Posts
- 714
- Likes
- 25
Hmmm, going balanced would force me to buy a speaker amp for my future he-4
/6 ;D oh how this horrible mentality runs my wallet.
/6 ;D oh how this horrible mentality runs my wallet.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)