Lotoo Paw 6000 (2019)
Oct 8, 2019 at 8:39 PM Post #17 of 1,457
Didn't realize we had PAW6000 dedicated thread (or maybe I forgot about it); posted these pictures already in LPGT thread... Identical build (like a tank), identical fast OS with all the bells'n'whistles, uses micro SD card, and as it was already mentioned 4493 DAC, 300mW power (down from 500mW of LPGT), and I think no oversampling chip. But the sound, after a day of burn it sounds kind of close, maybe a little fuller body in mids/vocals and a bit more punchier bass. One thing for sure, there was a much bigger gap between LPG and PAW5000 than I'm hearing between LPGT and PAW6000. I will let it play in a loop for a few days, let it cook more.

lotoo_lpgt_vs_paw6k-x03.jpg lotoo_lpgt_vs_paw6k-x04.jpg lotoo_lpgt_vs_paw6k-x05.jpg lotoo_lpgt_vs_paw6k-x06.jpg
 
Oct 9, 2019 at 1:45 AM Post #18 of 1,457
Will this have streaming?
 
Oct 9, 2019 at 6:20 AM Post #19 of 1,457
Will this have streaming?

It's identical to LPGT. It supports bidirectional Bluetooth (LDAC) and if you want steaming you pair it up with your smartphone or tablet to use it as a wireless dac/amp. This is not Android DAP.
 
Oct 9, 2019 at 7:06 AM Post #21 of 1,457
Nice. But AKM chips are not for me. Don't like this 'velvet sound'.

I probably have close to a dozen of daps with akm dacs, and they (daps) sound different based on dac implementation and also differences in amplifier output stage design.
 
Oct 9, 2019 at 4:58 PM Post #24 of 1,457
Maybe. For me all AKM chips are flat and boring in sound. Especially iBasso DX150 disapointed me.
I'm simply Cirrus Logic and Sabre sound fan.

Yes, DX150 or X5iii are the examples of poor (scaled down) AKM implementation. But look at LPGT and PAW6000, M11 and M11 Pro, Plenue 2 and L, SP1000 and SP2000, and even DTR1. Have you heard any of these DAPs? They are not boring :wink:
 
Oct 24, 2019 at 1:28 PM Post #28 of 1,457
Oct 24, 2019 at 1:29 PM Post #29 of 1,457
Didn't realize we had PAW6000 dedicated thread (or maybe I forgot about it); posted these pictures already in LPGT thread... Identical build (like a tank), identical fast OS with all the bells'n'whistles, uses micro SD card, and as it was already mentioned 4493 DAC, 300mW power (down from 500mW of LPGT), and I think no oversampling chip. But the sound, after a day of burn it sounds kind of close, maybe a little fuller body in mids/vocals and a bit more punchier bass. One thing for sure, there was a much bigger gap between LPG and PAW5000 than I'm hearing between LPGT and PAW6000. I will let it play in a loop for a few days, let it cook more.


Paw 6000 have the same EQ system of the LTPGT?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top