Those tubes you mention are CGE 6DT6A Japan "made to CGE specifications" right? I just got the same tubes in the mail, and threw them on the amp for a thorough burn-in; so I'm interested in your experience with them!
First impressions are favorable; indeed the bass roars with these! Too many of the recent tubes I tried either smeared mid-bass and bass or just left it out of the picture entirely.
EF92'd, these 6DT6A are very nice out of the box: surprisingly musical and toe-tapping from the start, delicious and pretty tactile bass, very nice mids that beautify voices. Hopefully they'll stay that way after 20 hours, and just tighten up. Still, finally having a bit of low-mids and bass is a nice change!
Why EF92 setting you say? (Please don't hit me lol) Because it's what sounded the best on the GE Canada-made 6DT6A I tried, for one. And also because it is one the two solutions that intuitively make sense with this tube type. I see no reason to float grid 3 with these tubes, so plain EF95 is bleh. Strapping the two control grids together (1-7) is OK but the tube doesn't require it to work well, so meh, but it's worth a try. Now, Strapping the suppressor/2nd control grid (grid 3) to the cathode (2-7) is pretty logical, but grid 3 on these tubes is pretty weird and like a tightly woven suppressor, so I don't know how it behaves 2-7'd with grid 2 strapped to the anode; but it makes sense. Finally, Strapping grid 3 to the anode and grid 2 (EF92) makes sense since you get a textbook triode-strapped pentode -dual control or not, whatever. That setting sounds the best to me so far.
Yeah, call me too scholar or Manichean if you want, and there's no harm in testing things, but some settings just don't make much sense... Floating grid 3 on a pentode is just kind of purposeless imho...