gibosi
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2012
- Posts
- 6,451
- Likes
- 4,903
Sylvania 6HZ6 (and probably the Sylvania 6DT6 as well)
In order to get a handle on the sound of this tube, I pulled out the Sylvania 5915 (a premium version of the 6BY6) to compare. For those just joining us, this tube first came to our attention wearing Telefunken paint. Dubbed a "Tele/vania" by Audiofanboy, this is an excellent tube. You can read more about it here and here
Now my Sylvania 5915 are wearing plain-jane Sylvania paint, not the fancy Telefunken paint, but inside they are identical to the Tele/vanias.
For both tubes, I used the EF95 1-7 configuration. Initially, my old ears could not discern any significant difference between these tubes. Both have strong, detailed bass, clear vocals that are less warm than the RCA and Tung Sol, and open and airy highs with great detail. But then I remembered Audiofanboy's comments about the Tele/vania's sound stage on Dreams from Fleetwood Mac's album Rumors, and I added it to my play list.
While both of these tubes have a very wide sound stage, the 6HZ6 seems to be a bit more two dimensional, whereas, the 5915 is more three-dimensional. With the 6HZ6, vocals are right in your face, but with the 5915, vocals and instruments seem to be a tad bit farther away and there is a very real sense of 3D space. As Audiofanboy put it, a "boundless" sound stage.
So while the Sylvania 6HZ6 is still a very good tube, I have to give the nod to the Sylvania 5915 due to it's superior staging. And if you do not have this tube in your collection, I encourage you to get a pair.
In order to get a handle on the sound of this tube, I pulled out the Sylvania 5915 (a premium version of the 6BY6) to compare. For those just joining us, this tube first came to our attention wearing Telefunken paint. Dubbed a "Tele/vania" by Audiofanboy, this is an excellent tube. You can read more about it here and here
Now my Sylvania 5915 are wearing plain-jane Sylvania paint, not the fancy Telefunken paint, but inside they are identical to the Tele/vanias.
For both tubes, I used the EF95 1-7 configuration. Initially, my old ears could not discern any significant difference between these tubes. Both have strong, detailed bass, clear vocals that are less warm than the RCA and Tung Sol, and open and airy highs with great detail. But then I remembered Audiofanboy's comments about the Tele/vania's sound stage on Dreams from Fleetwood Mac's album Rumors, and I added it to my play list.
While both of these tubes have a very wide sound stage, the 6HZ6 seems to be a bit more two dimensional, whereas, the 5915 is more three-dimensional. With the 6HZ6, vocals are right in your face, but with the 5915, vocals and instruments seem to be a tad bit farther away and there is a very real sense of 3D space. As Audiofanboy put it, a "boundless" sound stage.
So while the Sylvania 6HZ6 is still a very good tube, I have to give the nod to the Sylvania 5915 due to it's superior staging. And if you do not have this tube in your collection, I encourage you to get a pair.