Hifihedgehog
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2007
- Posts
- 937
- Likes
- 189
For example: soundstage, resolution and clarity, do not always relate to any measurements.
I concur in that no one can predict necessarily in certain terms how great objective performance in one area or another will translate to great subjective performance. Generally speaking, however, an excellent measuring DAC will sound clear, dynamic and resolving compared to lesser offerings. Furthermore, I disagree that the Surface Pro 4's headphone jack is vastly inferior, but actually is vastly superior to many DACs. I cannot begin to count the myriad family members and colleagues who have noted without hesitation how poorer performing DACs (in particular, the DragonFly 1.2 and many of the FiiOs) have sounded muffled and boring compared to my Surface's built-in headphone jack. The issue is many engineers simply drop and place expensive exotic chips on a PCB without seriously taking into account component topology, which is tremendously important. As a parallel example, you might have the most powerful land-based telescope on the planet but unless you have a clear night sky and you have it pointed with just the right azimuth and heading you are wasting all that incredible potential. For all you know, you could be peering at a vast metropolis of city lights when you were really wanting to see the constellation of Cyngus (the Northern Cross).