Snake
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
- Posts
- 2,004
- Likes
- 17
Quote:
Well, like I said, I (quite personally, I am not in a position to change the matter) do not like what the decision is fundamentally stating in terms of control of reference and cross-relational databases. It is an...ugly...precedent. Hopefully it will change in the end, but to what I'm not sure
Originally Posted by blackcoffee /img/forum/go_quote.gif Not only a swedish court, but the lowest level of swedish courts. This case would have been appealed regardless of the outcome and moved from the "amateur" court to the next level where only professional judges are making the decisions. There are a number of questionable wordings in the sencence which will be discussed in great lenght before the next step. (The court "Tingsrätt" which have made this sentence is actually made up of one judge and three or four layman "jurors". Although these jurors are not appointed case by case, instead they are appointed by the political leaders of the regional goverment and have their positions for years. They are still laymen from a legal sense. It is very common to have the decisions changes once appealed to the next level, "Hovrätt"). |
Well, like I said, I (quite personally, I am not in a position to change the matter) do not like what the decision is fundamentally stating in terms of control of reference and cross-relational databases. It is an...ugly...precedent. Hopefully it will change in the end, but to what I'm not sure