That's my current favorite combo. GG to BHSE to SR009. Use the tubes to change the sound a bit based on music.
I am currently balanced all the way through but don't see why you couldn't go SE.
Thank you Crashem. Certainly food for thought.
I would be balanced all the way through too as I am a big fan of balanced hifi systems vs SE.
Bonesey. On my Audio Note DAC 5 balanced v SE is no different. Only louder but otherwise the same SQ. It uses another tap on the output transformer. On the GG it has another set of tubes to do the balanced signal. That is a cost and maintenance issue and I would have to be convinced it was worth the cost and hassle. What if the other set of tubes was not exactly the same signature or level (as tubes are) How would that work? I have no idea, only asking.
Many amplifiers are not actually balanced as in true 2 separate circuits. I am not sure the BHSE is a true balanced design front to back? The best way to know for sure is try it, but that may be difficult. If I move DACs I would buy the SE GG version.
I have been talking to piles of Lampi and Audio Note users over the last 3 weeks, many on German forums. Most seem to say the GG is best on DSD, possibly as it has a pure data stream (no filtering). I am not sure, only what they have told me. The GG on PCM is very good, but not incredible. I have been told to keep my Audio Note DAC 5 if I don't have true DSD material as it does Redbook so well.
The other turn off for me on the DSD upsampled PCM route in the GG (apart from my Mac Mini cant do 512, only 256) 's I hate USB. I know, some DACs may have great input, maybe the GG does? But I have NOT ever heard yet a USB feed I was happy with. AOIP gave be an immediate jump in SQ. BUT AOIP is limited in my setting to SPDIF / AES which is 192K. Thus to get the GG magic, I would be forced to go back to USB, so IMO seems like a step forward, and 2 steps back. I can't personally verify (heard) any of this, only work on owners responses who have the GG and have / had my DAC.
Last year I head the CH Precision C1 on USB, and it was very impressive, but again had that treble edge or shill character that I had to get away from using the 009s on certain female vocals and strings. I was told by the dealer it is best on Ethernet using the other unit (18K more money, or an ehternet board (6.5K) I couldn't afford that anyway. t don't put that sound I heard down to my Carbon amp either, as I heard it on the BHSE and K-01 combo also using USB although from a not optimised Mac Mini at that time. In that C1 home demo demo I had, when I returned same day to my 'lowly' AMR DP-777 it had no shrill issues at all with those same tracks. The AMR is R-2R and tubed. The C1 is R-2R but up samples PCM to some insane sample rate and is then a solid state gain stage.
Quite possibly the C1 with the X1 and D1 is world class? But you then looking at an 60K+ DAC system.
I would try to get to beg or borrow a Lampi GG SE. I am over in June if you can await that long. We could have a blitz demo with my 009 and Carbon and your BHSE if you fancy it?