La Figaro 339
Sep 27, 2010 at 10:35 PM Post #91 of 6,903
Actually, 6AS7 have two triodes inside. Since DV339 have 2 x 6AS7 tubes then the amp could be created as push-pull... IF they want... (size permit, plenty of space...)...
 
But, Lafigaro (or Darkvoice) decide to use the two triodes in parallel in SE configuration. An amp topology is designer prerogative, right?
 
Sep 28, 2010 at 10:30 PM Post #93 of 6,903
current boosting could be one of the reason... I saw some amp (like Woo) use only 1 x 6AS7 for both L & R channels..
 
the other possible reasons are to lower output impedance and to lower operating (voltage)
 
Sep 28, 2010 at 10:38 PM Post #94 of 6,903
Redbull, I saw that you have Leben 3000 and DV337 THA in your headamp inventory... Leben use EL84 as power tube and 337 use 6AS7 as power tube... what is your opinion no both?
 
Oct 4, 2010 at 9:24 PM Post #96 of 6,903
Quote:
Redbull, I saw that you have Leben 3000 and DV337 THA in your headamp inventory... Leben use EL84 as power tube and 337 use 6AS7 as power tube... what is your opinion no both?


Leben uses 2x EL84 for each channel, push-pull, with feedback and output transformer.
THA337 using single 6AS7 dual triode on each channel, I guess no feedback (never read info on this), and OTL.
 
Sound impression on Leben in comparison to DV337,
- Leben is more 'clean' sounding, instrument separation is better, maybe due to its feedback system? 337 is more 'round', lush and 'romantic' in comparison, breath can be heard more on Leben.
 
- Leben FAST! and very dynamic, bass quantity is slightly less, but very impactful, hard hitting and very detailed, maybe due to its push-pull system and a lot of POWER? DV bass sound a little 'loose' in comparison, not that DV bass is bad, it is actually a LOT better than GS Solo SRG I used to have.
 
- Leben treble is very very clean and extended, maybe due to the nature of Pentode's vs Triode, makes DV sound a little less refined on top and a little roll off, but still VERY good.
 
- Leben timbre is very good, realistic and 3 dimensional, I don't know what causes this, maybe due to its design itself and PLENTY of power (2 power Pentode for 1 channel?), superior control to the headphone driver.  It's much easier to identify what is the material making that sound, is it wood, metal, woodwind, string, without having to think hard, it's so obvious.
 
- Leben soundstage is slightly narrower than DV.
 
Despite my comment above, I LOVE both, yes they sounded different, but there's something in DV that I can't miss.
 
My friend is in the process of building Crack, it will be interesting to compare the sound to DV, considering Crack is using one dual triode for 2 channel and use triode as the driver tube, DV is using Pentode as driver tube.
 
That's all I can capture the differences of both.
 
Oct 9, 2010 at 5:22 AM Post #97 of 6,903
I redesigned the new machine 339 in order to further improve 337.
The output capacitance of 337 series machines is only 50μF but 339 is 130μF, so 339 have more strength in the bass, the structure of 339 is more reasonable,the pipe is on the front,far from the the transformer  avoiding the interference, especially in low impedance,the headphones can be very clear, 337 has mild hum when it running low impedance headphones.
339 has great improve in using device, tube. RCA socket.and Headphone socket by cmc both make reliability more better.
 
 
Oct 9, 2010 at 8:50 AM Post #99 of 6,903
How is the 339 compared to the 332s? esp. for driving HD650(300 ohm) and k701(62 ohm), wich im planning to buy next year.
 
 
 
 
 
Oct 9, 2010 at 9:21 AM Post #100 of 6,903
RedBull, very well said!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top