SymphonyX7
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2014
- Posts
- 74
- Likes
- 18
Does anyone can compare the KZ's to the Philips SHE3590, Huawei Honor and others ~$10 options? Need some advice on building my stock of Christmas gifts![]()
Against my SHE3580 (or 3590) with equalizer settings to balance out the spectrum, this is how it plays out compared to the ES and ED Special Edition. I won't compare it stock, since the SHE3590 is sounds just above average without any EQ. The SHE3590 being receptive to EQing is what makes it special, imo.
Extension
Sub-bass: EDSE > 3590 > ES
Mid-bass: 3590 > ES > EDSE
Mids: ES > 3590 > EDSE
Treble: ES > 3590 > EDSE
Detail retrieval
Bass: 3590 > ES > EDSE
Mids: 3590 = ES > EDSE
Treble: ES > 3590 > EDSE
Soundstage and 3D effect
Width: 3590 > ES > EDSE
Depth: ES > 3590 > EDSE
Imaging (what I'd call accuracy of positioning, to put it bluntly): ES > 3590 > EDSE
I won't dwell on tonality and sound signature. But I believe these parameters are easily identifiable during A/B comparisons.
Also, do note that my SHE3580 have well over 1000 hours on it. My ES have close to 150 hours while the EDSE have close to 100 hours.
In terms of build quality, the SHE3590 has an injection molded jack. Its 3.5 jack isn't hollow, so the copper core isn't likely to break even with repeated bending, which often happens when you move around the music player or when the player is in the pocket. The only caveat is the cables can be brittle after a long time, especially when you leave them tangled. The cables literally fall apart when that happens. I roll up mine like you would a garden hose or lasso, so it's still very elastic after nearly 3 years. The ES and EDSE on the other hand have better cables and an L-shaped jack, although I can't attest to their longevity yet as I've only owned them for a month.