Quote:
Originally Posted by Lupine /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Has anyone tried both the X-10 and X-5? How big of a step down is it to the X-5?
|
Yes, I have heard both. However, it was for a short amount of time. My comparison is based on about 30 minutes at CanJam in Florida. I tried the X10 first and was duly impressed by their size and comfort, as well as what I perceived to be a "big" sound relative to same. Then I tried the X5 and I simply liked it better. I felt like there was more detail and refinement to the X5, better speed and agility. Frankly, I was surprised. I knew going in that the X10 was the flagship. But during that time I liked the X5 better.
Fast forward to today. Why did I get the X10? Mostly based on the collective assessment that the X10 has a more laid back sound, with more bass. An assessment that is not inconsistent with my own experience at CJ. I was looking specifically for a commuting can that is bassy, warm, and groovy--if not the last word in detail. Thus, I decided on the X10. I find that my UE-10 can be fatiguing, which was the last thing I wanted for a new set of commuter IEMs.
Based on my ride home this evening, I am pleased that I went with the X10. The warmer presentation and surprising bass are nice for rock, without being sloppy, so that classical is also handled fine.
So, to sum up. I'm not sure I would describe the X5 as a step down. To me, it's different. More detailed and quicker, whereas the X10 is warmer and has an overall "sweeter" presentation. If you want that nth degee of detail, I suggest the X5. If you want a groovier, more "fun" sound, I suggest the X10.
Hopefully that helps at least a little.